社會行為( 經濟 心理 社會 政治 文化) - 經濟
By Aaliyah
at 2010-09-30T01:34
at 2010-09-30T01:34
Table of Contents
→ letibe:yeah 沒弄錯的話他只是以交易成本的存在糾正反托拉斯法的 09/30 00:20
→ letibe:不當，但似乎沒強調無法量化(我看的是80年代前paper，也許 09/30 00:22
→ letibe:近年發展出更多方法，他的課程網搞不好有) 09/30 00:22
我想你是對的
我自己對於交易成本的看法是
交易成本這個概念與意義的理解的重要性更甚於將交易成本量化或模型化
我甚至認為,Coase當初提出交易成本這個概念的本意
是要強調交易成本的重要與不可忽視
而非一般常見的"在交易成本為零的情況下"所作的探討
(如果交易成本的概念很重要,又怎可輕易的假設為零)
只是,到目前為止,就我所知的範圍內
大多數的經濟學家的研究仍然欠缺對於交易成本的討論
甚至是在交易成本為零的假設下探討外部性
這難道不是一件很弔詭的事情嗎?
一點點小小的想法
好像越說越離題了XD(迷之聲:內文與標題不符,裁定劣退!!!)
--
Tags:
經濟
All Comments
By Kristin
at 2010-09-30T07:54
at 2010-09-30T07:54
By Jessica
at 2010-09-30T13:41
at 2010-09-30T13:41
By Selena
at 2010-10-03T19:49
at 2010-10-03T19:49
By Odelette
at 2010-10-08T17:51
at 2010-10-08T17:51
By Jacky
at 2010-10-10T13:32
at 2010-10-10T13:32
By Hazel
at 2010-10-11T19:01
at 2010-10-11T19:01
By Oscar
at 2010-10-13T07:34
at 2010-10-13T07:34
By Kumar
at 2010-10-15T14:16
at 2010-10-15T14:16
By Tom
at 2010-10-19T07:27
at 2010-10-19T07:27
By Carol
at 2010-10-20T18:29
at 2010-10-20T18:29
By Lily
at 2010-10-23T20:31
at 2010-10-23T20:31
By Andy
at 2010-10-26T13:47
at 2010-10-26T13:47
By Olga
at 2010-10-28T09:16
at 2010-10-28T09:16
By Emma
at 2010-10-30T16:45
at 2010-10-30T16:45
By Gilbert
at 2010-10-31T02:40
at 2010-10-31T02:40
By Charlie
at 2010-10-31T10:10
at 2010-10-31T10:10
By Christine
at 2010-11-03T13:37
at 2010-11-03T13:37
By Skylar DavisLinda
at 2010-11-04T23:33
at 2010-11-04T23:33
By Catherine
at 2010-11-05T09:19
at 2010-11-05T09:19
By George
at 2010-11-07T01:54
at 2010-11-07T01:54
By Olga
at 2010-11-09T10:23
at 2010-11-09T10:23
Related Posts
社會行為( 經濟 心理 社會 政治 文化)
By Annie
at 2010-09-29T13:58
at 2010-09-29T13:58
社會行為( 經濟 心理 社會 政治 文化)
By Linda
at 2010-09-29T13:18
at 2010-09-29T13:18
關於經濟發展的問題
By Eden
at 2010-09-29T08:59
at 2010-09-29T08:59
請教一下 應該是公共財的問題
By William
at 2010-09-29T07:19
at 2010-09-29T07:19
社會行為( 經濟 心理 社會 政治 文化)
By Bethany
at 2010-09-29T01:08
at 2010-09-29T01:08