Re: 分享兩篇貿易理論的文章 - 經濟

Caroline avatar
By Caroline
at 2010-01-04T12:16

Table of Contents

http://www.nber.org/papers/w4597.pdf
〈The Politics of Free Trade Agreements〉 by Elhanan Helpman & Gene Grossman

[Abstract]

Suppose that an opportunity arises for two countries to negotiate a free
trade agreement (FTA). Will an FTA between these countries be politically
viable? And if so, what form will it take? We address these questions using a
political-economy framework that emphasizes the interaction between industry
special interest groups and an incumbent government. We describe the economic
conditions necessary for an FTA to be an equilibrium outcome, both for the
case when the agreement must cover all bilateral trade and when a few,
politically sensitive sectors can be excluded from the agreement.

在福利分析段落提到的 trade creation(貿易創造)跟 trade diversion(貿易轉向)
可以在國際貿易理論專書關於區域經濟整合的章節中查詢

====================

http://www.nber.org/papers/w5355.pdf
〈Technology, Trade, and Factor Prices〉 by Paul Krugman

[Abstract]

A number of recent studies appear to show that international trade is a
secondary factor in the growing inequality of wages, with technology probably
the main culprit. These studies have, however, been subjected to severe and
in some cases harshly worded criticism by trade theorists, who argue that the
authors of these studies have misspecified the impacts of both technology and
trade on factor prices. This paper shows that it is the critics who are
confused. In particular, much recent discussion about technology, trade, and
wages is marked by a failure to distinguish between the models we all use and
the particular thought experiments we typically use to teach these models --
which happen not to be the appropriate thought experiments we need to analyze
the real-world issues.

====================

http://www.princeton.edu/~pkrugman/pk-bpea-draft.pdf
〈Trade and Wages, Reconsidered〉 by Paul Krugman

陳博志提到的文章,基本上就是對上篇文章的再思考

8,90 年代貿易領域著名三 man,沒修過貿論的可以順便認識一下

又看到光拿本《一課經濟學》就來包山包海做政策評論的
如果你的醫生說他都不是靠新英格蘭醫學期刊,而是健康小百科這類讀物來充實醫學知識
你敢給他醫嗎?

入門書不是不好,易上手的代價就在知識有限
更別說貿論教科書本身也會談最適關稅
比如針對國外獨占廠商,本國政府可以透過課稅來提升福利的狀況
又以金融海嘯為例,Bernanke 於 07 下半年就開始降息了
(其理論基礎與政策應用:http://tinyurl.com/yg7t3p9
http://tinyurl.com/2wjahttp://tinyurl.com/6rprb7
在 08 年普遍憂慮高通膨的氛圍下曾被罵翻天
該年 9 月出現要財政部紓困的議題時,Lucas 還說:
「情勢或許會變得緊迫,但此刻並不那麼急,目前就只是個金融業的問題。」
(by #18tnvKa7
對現實的社會情況如何,大師們意見都未必一致了
又怎能妄想光靠本入門書來當政策指引?


--
Tags: 經濟

All Comments

Rachel avatar
By Rachel
at 2010-01-06T00:34
專業的評論...^^
Margaret avatar
By Margaret
at 2010-01-08T17:54
閣下的文章立論清楚,邏輯簡要明瞭。

ECFA的問題

Daniel avatar
By Daniel
at 2010-01-04T01:51
看到前面幾位先進提到 ECFA (Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement) 的議題. 我想笨笨的請教一個問題: 那位先進知道 ECFA 的內容 (或者全文) ? 我找過 google, 可是還是沒找到. 可以的話, 能不能煩請給予網頁說明? -- 畢竟, 要 ...

別亂否認工資會被中國拉下(陳博志)

Enid avatar
By Enid
at 2010-01-03T23:58
※ 引述《YHLYHL (戰神是唬爛王!)》之銘言: : 對啊,你PO的一整個廢文,卻要說別人廢文,這種人也太有才了,哈哈。 : 舉個例子來說吧,不然你這天才不會認帳的,哈哈。 : A國生產蘋果跟西瓜,西瓜成本1工時/個,蘋果成本1工時/個,共600工時 : A國對蘋果及西瓜的效用相同。 : 自由貿易前共生產 ...

別亂否認工資會被中國拉下(陳博志)

Megan avatar
By Megan
at 2010-01-03T23:45
※ 引述《schooldance (呆頭鵝)》之銘言: 國際貿易是不可免,也很少人反對的。但完全自由的貿易卻不見得是最好的選擇,和中國 這一類有種種政府補貼及不公平政策干預的國家完全自由貿易,更像是赤手空拳和拿刀的 人比賽一樣,是非常危險的。所以我一向主張若要和中國簽ECFA而進行自由貿易,必須要 先和中國談 ...

別亂否認工資會被中國拉下(陳博志)

Mia avatar
By Mia
at 2010-01-03T22:52
※ 引述《YHLYHL (戰神是唬爛王!)》之銘言: : A國生產蘋果跟西瓜,西瓜成本1工時/個,蘋果成本1工時/個,共600工時 : A國對蘋果及西瓜的效用相同。 : 自由貿易前共生產西瓜300個,蘋果300個 : B國生產蘋果跟西瓜,西瓜成本2工時/個,蘋果成本4工時/個,共600工時 : B國對於蘋果及 ...

別亂否認工資會被中國拉下(陳博志)

Olga avatar
By Olga
at 2010-01-03T22:25
※ 引述《noeru (TIMING)》之銘言: : 唉 我輸了 我承認我輸了 唉,所以說:貿易雙方都可以享受到貿易利益?哈哈,丟人囉。 : 我竟然還是回了 : 這種廢文我竟然願意花時間回 唉,錯了不認錯,果然是標準的丟人囉,哈哈。 不知道是你PO了廢文還要別人教你的文章廢,還是別人教你的文章廢啊,哈哈。 ...