進步性的優惠期 - 專利
By Margaret
at 2013-04-09T06:23
at 2013-04-09T06:23
Table of Contents
最近在處理一個美國案OA,請大家給一下意見,
這個案子申請前已有論文發表,作者是A、B、C、D,
申請時有提論文為IDS,也在一年優惠期內提申專利,
專利發明人A、B、C、D、E、F,也就是包含論文作者,
審查委員以此NPL(non-patent literature)是用進步性103(a)而非新穎性102核駁,
我想請問的是我可以直接答辯說專利發明人已包含論文作者,因此這篇NPL應適用優惠期
而不能用103(a)打自己嗎?
或是說MPEP中有沒有那邊可以參考,謝謝囉
--
Tags:
專利
All Comments
By Odelette
at 2013-04-13T03:45
at 2013-04-13T03:45
By Joe
at 2013-04-13T06:57
at 2013-04-13T06:57
By Noah
at 2013-04-14T21:34
at 2013-04-14T21:34
By Bennie
at 2013-04-16T09:36
at 2013-04-16T09:36
By Freda
at 2013-04-16T11:09
at 2013-04-16T11:09
By Lauren
at 2013-04-19T01:32
at 2013-04-19T01:32
By Hedda
at 2013-04-19T14:58
at 2013-04-19T14:58
By Ethan
at 2013-04-23T21:33
at 2013-04-23T21:33
Related Posts
專利疑問
By Oscar
at 2013-04-09T02:54
at 2013-04-09T02:54
實務上 著作權與設計專利之界線為何?
By Caroline
at 2013-04-08T15:55
at 2013-04-08T15:55
財團法人專利檢索中心
By Rachel
at 2013-04-06T15:52
at 2013-04-06T15:52
財團法人專利檢索中心
By Jake
at 2013-04-06T06:45
at 2013-04-06T06:45
新的教學發法能有專利的價值嗎
By Edward Lewis
at 2013-04-06T01:24
at 2013-04-06T01:24