請問自然獨占 - 經濟

By Hardy
at 2008-09-25T02:15
at 2008-09-25T02:15
Table of Contents
"因規模經濟而形成的自然獨占,為成本遞減產業"
我知道自然獨占需要大量的固定成本投入,必須發揮規模經濟
以降低平均成本,才能獲利 所以自然獨占所畫的LAC是負斜率的
LAC負斜率多是因為規模報酬遞減所形成的規模經濟
但成本遞減產業不是因為產業規模擴大 造成要素價格降低而導致的LAC整條
線下移嗎?
所以我只能了解 自然獨占有平均成本遞減的特性 可是那是負斜率LAC的關係
但自然獨占跟"成本遞減產業"有一定的關係嗎?
謝謝了!!
--
Tags:
經濟
All Comments

By Steve
at 2008-09-27T03:53
at 2008-09-27T03:53

By Frederica
at 2008-10-01T17:33
at 2008-10-01T17:33

By Edward Lewis
at 2008-10-02T11:25
at 2008-10-02T11:25

By Catherine
at 2008-10-02T17:26
at 2008-10-02T17:26

By Oliver
at 2008-10-03T11:26
at 2008-10-03T11:26

By Robert
at 2008-10-06T22:38
at 2008-10-06T22:38

By Charlie
at 2008-10-11T03:20
at 2008-10-11T03:20

By Jessica
at 2008-10-13T05:46
at 2008-10-13T05:46

By Quanna
at 2008-10-18T02:48
at 2008-10-18T02:48

By Erin
at 2008-10-20T10:42
at 2008-10-20T10:42

By Franklin
at 2008-10-20T17:35
at 2008-10-20T17:35

By Agnes
at 2008-10-22T03:18
at 2008-10-22T03:18

By Ivy
at 2008-10-26T13:57
at 2008-10-26T13:57

By Rae
at 2008-10-29T19:58
at 2008-10-29T19:58

By William
at 2008-10-31T15:26
at 2008-10-31T15:26

By Carolina Franco
at 2008-11-05T00:32
at 2008-11-05T00:32

By Mia
at 2008-11-06T07:52
at 2008-11-06T07:52
Related Posts
為什麼金融資本既競爭又能賺大錢?(上)

By Hedwig
at 2008-09-24T22:28
at 2008-09-24T22:28
美國的軍事和經濟

By Skylar Davis
at 2008-09-24T02:55
at 2008-09-24T02:55
美國的軍事和經濟

By Doris
at 2008-09-23T08:29
at 2008-09-23T08:29
我可以直接看個經嗎?

By Agnes
at 2008-09-23T00:55
at 2008-09-23T00:55
請問有人做過聖彼得堡矛盾嗎?

By Skylar Davis
at 2008-09-23T00:38
at 2008-09-23T00:38