一案兩請 - 專利
By Ida
at 2010-08-04T17:07
at 2010-08-04T17:07
Table of Contents
如題
我國專利法第31條第2項後段規定
其申請人為同一人時,應通知申請人限期擇一申請,
屆期未擇一申請者,均不予發明專利。
假設一種狀況: 申請人一案兩請,新型經形式審查,
公告給予專利,當審查發明專利之審查官,發現了
申請人的新型專利,要求擇一
申請人選擇發明,而新型專利是被撤銷還是消滅?
問題二
撤銷 自始不存在 所以新型公告至選擇這段期間也都沒有效力
消滅 新型專利效力 僅至選擇發明這段期間
撤銷跟消滅我不是很肯定..
請教問題二的觀念是正確的嗎?
謝謝!
--
Tags:
專利
All Comments
By Todd Johnson
at 2010-08-05T07:34
at 2010-08-05T07:34
By Tristan Cohan
at 2010-08-06T02:10
at 2010-08-06T02:10
By Leila
at 2010-08-10T14:23
at 2010-08-10T14:23
By Hamiltion
at 2010-08-11T04:00
at 2010-08-11T04:00
By Agatha
at 2010-08-12T04:10
at 2010-08-12T04:10
By Kelly
at 2010-08-16T20:18
at 2010-08-16T20:18
By Kama
at 2010-08-20T00:59
at 2010-08-20T00:59
By Una
at 2010-08-23T00:16
at 2010-08-23T00:16
By Skylar Davis
at 2010-08-23T02:31
at 2010-08-23T02:31
By Zora
at 2010-08-27T02:35
at 2010-08-27T02:35
By Carolina Franco
at 2010-08-27T07:10
at 2010-08-27T07:10
By Harry
at 2010-08-28T17:10
at 2010-08-28T17:10
By Olga
at 2010-09-01T13:00
at 2010-09-01T13:00
By Selena
at 2010-09-05T16:22
at 2010-09-05T16:22
By Daniel
at 2010-09-09T08:35
at 2010-09-09T08:35
Related Posts
請問台灣專利審查員的點數如何計算
By Callum
at 2010-08-03T23:26
at 2010-08-03T23:26
分割和改請的補充修正有受49條或100條ꨠ…
By Ethan
at 2010-08-02T17:23
at 2010-08-02T17:23
請問哪可以找的到專利侵權利案例
By Emma
at 2010-08-02T14:07
at 2010-08-02T14:07
分割和改請的補充修正有受49條或100條的限制
By Suhail Hany
at 2010-08-02T10:06
at 2010-08-02T10:06
新型專利 CLAIM 製程
By Agatha
at 2010-08-02T02:33
at 2010-08-02T02:33