New Keynesian Economics之界定 - 經濟

關於 new c 與 new k 的界定, 我同樣的, 想引用 w 兄所介紹的 Snowdon, Vane 以及
Wynarczyk (1994) 所寫的另一本書 A Modern Guide to Macroeconomics
- An Introduction to Competing Schools of Thought 內的另一段話做個補充:

In their brief survey of new Keynesian economics Mankiw and Romer (1991)
define new Kenesian economics with reference to the answer a particular theory
gives to the following pair of questions:

Question 1: Does the theory violate the classcial dichotomy?
That is, is money non-neutral?

Question 2: Does the theory assume that real market inperfections in the
economy are crucial for understanding economic fluctuations?

Of the mainstream schools only new Keynesians answer both questions in the
affirmative.

這段話的簡體中文翻譯是:

Mankiw 與 Romer (1991) 是從各個理論對下面兩個問題的回答來定義新興凱因斯主義
經濟學的.

問題1: 該理論是否違反古典二分法? 即, 貨幣是否是非中性的?
問題2: 該理論是否認為經濟中的實質 (real) 市場不完全性對於理解經濟波動十分關鍵?

在現有的幾個主要學派中, 只有新興凱因斯主義對兩個問題都予以肯定的答覆.

Mankiw 與 Romer (1991) 的原始文獻是:

Mankiw N.G. and Romer D. (eds) (1991), New Keynesian Economics, MIT Press.

--

個人十分推薦 Snowdon 等所寫的書.

--