election後的OA修正 - 專利

By Eartha
at 2013-05-17T22:16
at 2013-05-17T22:16
Table of Contents
近日收到一件美國選取後的OA
但礙於對選取不熟悉
有部分問題想請教各位前輩
1.申請時的請求項
claim 1:一種裝置,含有A,B,C,...(省略三者的連結關係)而C為X製成的.
claim 2:依附claim 1,進一步界定A,B,C的連結關係(對應實施例1)
claim 3:依附claim 1,進一步界定A,B,C的連結關係(對應實施例2)
claim 4:依附claim 1,進一步界定A,B,C的連結關係(對應實施例3)
claim 5:依附claim 1,進一步說明X為X1(X1有記載於實施例1-3)
2.選取回覆
官方來函指出claims 2-4分別說明不同發明,應選擇其中一者續審.選擇實施例1
(claim 2)續審,因此claims 3-5 withdrawn.
3.OA
官方來函指出claims 1,2不具新穎性及進步性.但申請人指出claim 1加上C為X1
製成的整體特徵應可克服此缺失.想請問能否於修正中,將claim 1的X修正為X1?
而我困惑的是:修正後的特徵不就是claim 5嗎?如此的修正是否妥當?或者各位前
輩有更好的建議?
--
但礙於對選取不熟悉
有部分問題想請教各位前輩
1.申請時的請求項
claim 1:一種裝置,含有A,B,C,...(省略三者的連結關係)而C為X製成的.
claim 2:依附claim 1,進一步界定A,B,C的連結關係(對應實施例1)
claim 3:依附claim 1,進一步界定A,B,C的連結關係(對應實施例2)
claim 4:依附claim 1,進一步界定A,B,C的連結關係(對應實施例3)
claim 5:依附claim 1,進一步說明X為X1(X1有記載於實施例1-3)
2.選取回覆
官方來函指出claims 2-4分別說明不同發明,應選擇其中一者續審.選擇實施例1
(claim 2)續審,因此claims 3-5 withdrawn.
3.OA
官方來函指出claims 1,2不具新穎性及進步性.但申請人指出claim 1加上C為X1
製成的整體特徵應可克服此缺失.想請問能否於修正中,將claim 1的X修正為X1?
而我困惑的是:修正後的特徵不就是claim 5嗎?如此的修正是否妥當?或者各位前
輩有更好的建議?
--
Tags:
專利
All Comments

By Rebecca
at 2013-05-20T16:11
at 2013-05-20T16:11

By Catherine
at 2013-05-25T08:11
at 2013-05-25T08:11

By George
at 2013-05-26T05:32
at 2013-05-26T05:32

By Regina
at 2013-05-28T00:38
at 2013-05-28T00:38

By Elvira
at 2013-05-29T21:28
at 2013-05-29T21:28

By Joseph
at 2013-05-30T08:19
at 2013-05-30T08:19

By Quanna
at 2013-05-31T07:01
at 2013-05-31T07:01

By Adele
at 2013-06-04T14:16
at 2013-06-04T14:16

By Audriana
at 2013-06-06T22:17
at 2013-06-06T22:17

By Anonymous
at 2013-06-11T00:33
at 2013-06-11T00:33

By Lucy
at 2013-06-12T15:16
at 2013-06-12T15:16

By Elizabeth
at 2013-06-15T08:33
at 2013-06-15T08:33

By Jessica
at 2013-06-16T21:48
at 2013-06-16T21:48

By Lily
at 2013-06-20T09:16
at 2013-06-20T09:16

By Charlotte
at 2013-06-22T03:42
at 2013-06-22T03:42

By Kristin
at 2013-06-25T23:58
at 2013-06-25T23:58

By Skylar DavisLinda
at 2013-06-30T07:14
at 2013-06-30T07:14

By Skylar Davis
at 2013-07-02T06:39
at 2013-07-02T06:39

By Hedy
at 2013-07-05T15:15
at 2013-07-05T15:15
Related Posts
非顯而易見性跟進步性

By Dora
at 2013-05-16T21:04
at 2013-05-16T21:04
專利權

By Brianna
at 2013-05-16T20:32
at 2013-05-16T20:32
專利權

By Charlotte
at 2013-05-15T23:51
at 2013-05-15T23:51
專利權

By Daph Bay
at 2013-05-15T20:02
at 2013-05-15T20:02
關於新加坡的工業設計專利

By Franklin
at 2013-05-14T16:34
at 2013-05-14T16:34