請問資金該放多券商or單一券商? - 保險
By Connor
at 2021-02-01T02:20
at 2021-02-01T02:20
Table of Contents
不太懂以下這句話:
https://www1.interactivebrokers.com/en/index.php?f=2334&p=acc
Client securities accounts at Interactive Brokers LLC are protected by the
Securities Investor Protection Corporation ("SIPC") for a maximum coverage of
$500,000 (with a cash sublimit of $250,000) and under Interactive Brokers
LLC's excess SIPC policy with certain underwriters at Lloyd's of London 1 for
up to an additional $30 million (with a cash sublimit of $900,000) subject to
an aggregate limit of $150 million.
借問一下:
1. IB的最高保障是$30 million 還是$150 million? 如果是後者 他提到
30 million意義為何?
2. 裡面提到maximum coverage of 或 up to an additional $30 million
中的 maximum 或up 都表示[最多賠你] 萬一倒閉 客戶太多 理賠金不夠
有可能無法100%賠?
3. IB我記得會把客戶的現金和股票交給花旗等多家銀行保管
萬一倒閉了 銀行端都有客戶資料 屆時銀行直接還給客戶就好了
為何大費周章加買倫敦再保險?
※ 編輯: ast2 (61.64.28.62 臺灣), 02/01/2021 02:22:25
https://www1.interactivebrokers.com/en/index.php?f=2334&p=acc
Client securities accounts at Interactive Brokers LLC are protected by the
Securities Investor Protection Corporation ("SIPC") for a maximum coverage of
$500,000 (with a cash sublimit of $250,000) and under Interactive Brokers
LLC's excess SIPC policy with certain underwriters at Lloyd's of London 1 for
up to an additional $30 million (with a cash sublimit of $900,000) subject to
an aggregate limit of $150 million.
借問一下:
1. IB的最高保障是$30 million 還是$150 million? 如果是後者 他提到
30 million意義為何?
2. 裡面提到maximum coverage of 或 up to an additional $30 million
中的 maximum 或up 都表示[最多賠你] 萬一倒閉 客戶太多 理賠金不夠
有可能無法100%賠?
3. IB我記得會把客戶的現金和股票交給花旗等多家銀行保管
萬一倒閉了 銀行端都有客戶資料 屆時銀行直接還給客戶就好了
為何大費周章加買倫敦再保險?
※ 編輯: ast2 (61.64.28.62 臺灣), 02/01/2021 02:22:25
推 taipoo: 是保證倒閉一定會理賠的意思嗎? 02/01 10:55
推 opie: 我的解讀是保險可以最高保到$150 million,但IB只保到$30mil 02/01 15:48
→ opie: 所以只賠50萬美加3000萬美元,但3000萬美元裡現金只賠90萬 02/01 15:50
推 daze: 我想是指所有客戶總共最高賠150M,單一客戶最高賠30M。IB據 02/01 20:49
→ daze: 說超過SIPC的客戶總資產約5B (2015年數據)...如果IB真的整個 02/01 20:51
→ daze: 炸掉,總共150M的保額其實嘛... 02/01 20:52
→ daze: BTW, fidelity的excess SIPC policy總額是1B。 02/01 20:52
推 daze: IB不炸掉的話,上週chairman訪談提到他們有9B的流動資金,這 02/01 20:58
→ daze: 保險其實沒啥用。IB炸掉的話,這保險只能cover個位數percent 02/01 20:59
→ daze: ,還是沒啥用。 02/01 20:59
→ daze: 上次IB小輕原油出事,似乎是用自有資金填了110M,也不是用保 02/01 21:01
→ daze: 險買單的樣子? 02/01 21:02
→ Risperidone: 還是複委託最安心 02/01 23:44
推 alex85830: 借問為何複委託比較安心,複委託不是也有上手券商嗎@@ 02/02 13:29
→ alex85830: ? 02/02 13:29
推 SweetLee: 複委託是300萬以內比較安心吧? 超過的話反而比海外的風 02/02 15:37
→ SweetLee: 險高 02/02 15:37
推 ken812025: 複委託 就找人吵架時可以用中文 + 不知道有沒有用的金 02/02 15:37
→ ken812025: 管會可以投訴 02/02 15:37
推 yurian: 複委託也可能炸掉阿 永豐元大是有比IB炸掉機率低? 02/02 20:35
推 rahim: 複委託炸掉你可以找投保或金管會 02/03 08:19
→ yurian: 這邊說的是上面說的炸掉是保險都沒辦法賠的時候 金管會會 02/03 14:07
→ yurian: 賠? 02/03 14:07
Tags:
保險
All Comments
By Donna
at 2021-02-02T05:55
at 2021-02-02T05:55
By Skylar DavisLinda
at 2021-02-04T23:05
at 2021-02-04T23:05
By Mia
at 2021-02-05T23:04
at 2021-02-05T23:04
By Joseph
at 2021-02-06T16:01
at 2021-02-06T16:01
By Adele
at 2021-02-06T23:02
at 2021-02-06T23:02
By Rebecca
at 2021-02-08T14:15
at 2021-02-08T14:15
By Mia
at 2021-02-09T12:42
at 2021-02-09T12:42
By Freda
at 2021-02-11T07:51
at 2021-02-11T07:51
By Skylar Davis
at 2021-02-13T07:54
at 2021-02-13T07:54
By Margaret
at 2021-02-16T17:44
at 2021-02-16T17:44
By Frederica
at 2021-02-19T13:14
at 2021-02-19T13:14
By Olive
at 2021-02-21T00:48
at 2021-02-21T00:48
By Daniel
at 2021-02-21T15:48
at 2021-02-21T15:48
By Andy
at 2021-02-23T17:38
at 2021-02-23T17:38
By Todd Johnson
at 2021-02-24T06:36
at 2021-02-24T06:36
By Ula
at 2021-02-27T01:51
at 2021-02-27T01:51
By Leila
at 2021-03-01T17:23
at 2021-03-01T17:23
Related Posts
IB 的歷史保證金敏感度
By Callum
at 2021-01-23T13:55
at 2021-01-23T13:55
保本但高於定存的美國長期投資
By Hedwig
at 2020-11-06T18:31
at 2020-11-06T18:31
外匯保證金詐騙? USG集團清算
By Olivia
at 2020-11-06T02:20
at 2020-11-06T02:20
指數型ETF投資建議(V.S美金儲蓄險)
By Daniel
at 2020-10-03T21:13
at 2020-10-03T21:13
新手投資分配規劃
By Ursula
at 2020-09-23T20:35
at 2020-09-23T20:35