請問美國terminal disclaimer - 專利
By Gilbert
at 2017-05-04T21:15
at 2017-05-04T21:15
Table of Contents
最近在研究一個美國案US7155308
該案為US6594844之CIP
US7155308原先Claim為A(多項)
在 non final rejection 時認為它與US6594844 double patenting
然後US7155308修正除了原本的A(多項)Claim外另新增B(多項)Claim
在 final rejection 時一樣認為是double patenting
然後US7155308把B系列Claim 刪除 並聲明terminal disclaimer
最後取得專利權
字義上的意思看似是放棄了US6594844的權利
但又發現US6594844一樣有繼續繳年費
故研究了一下terminal disclaimer的意思
審查委員應該是認為US7155308藉由CIP延長其專利期限
故其實兩個案件都是存在的 只是後案的專利期限與母案相同
請問我這樣的觀點是否正確? 還是有沒思考到的地方?
謝謝!
--
Tags:
專利
All Comments
By Ursula
at 2017-05-06T17:16
at 2017-05-06T17:16
By Iris
at 2017-05-06T20:10
at 2017-05-06T20:10
By Erin
at 2017-05-07T09:29
at 2017-05-07T09:29
By Necoo
at 2017-05-11T08:26
at 2017-05-11T08:26
By Joseph
at 2017-05-14T18:36
at 2017-05-14T18:36
By Victoria
at 2017-05-17T20:33
at 2017-05-17T20:33
By Una
at 2017-05-18T21:42
at 2017-05-18T21:42
By Una
at 2017-05-19T14:42
at 2017-05-19T14:42
Related Posts
專利保護範圍一問
By Cara
at 2017-05-04T11:40
at 2017-05-04T11:40
英國法院首件SEPs 權利金裁決案:Unwired
By Franklin
at 2017-05-02T11:24
at 2017-05-02T11:24
將群 vs 連邦 vs 巨群
By Mary
at 2017-04-30T22:05
at 2017-04-30T22:05
防律師出包 法務部建議採「律師責任強
By Una
at 2017-04-27T13:04
at 2017-04-27T13:04
關於智財局的專利檢索系統
By Isla
at 2017-04-26T21:19
at 2017-04-26T21:19