請問專利說明說上的先前技術 - 專利

By Delia
at 2011-06-21T17:52
at 2011-06-21T17:52
Table of Contents
※ 引述《yenner (圓....)》之銘言:
: 專利說明書上面的先前技術,可以拿來引用來打那個專利說明書嗎?
: 也就是拿自己專利說的先前技術來打他自己的專利,聽事務所的人說
: 這個是模糊地帶...每個人解釋都不一樣,看運氣的樣子...@_@?
看到原po的這篇文 讓我想到之前翻譯幾件英說的時候
有人在先前技術第一段寫這樣的文字:
The background description provided herein is for the purpose of generally
presenting the context of the disclosure. Work of the presently named
inventors, to the extent the work is described in this background section,
as well as aspects of the description that may not otherwise qualify as prior
art at the time of filing, are neither expressly nor impliedly admitted as
prior art against the present disclosure.
我翻成:
於此所述之背景內容係一般用以表示本發明之習知技術與本案之前後關係。
就於此背景部分敘述之發明人的作品而言,不應表達或暗示性地被當作核駁本發明之
先前技術,亦不適格作為申請時之先前技術。
所以這段講白一點 就是事先打一支預防針的意思啦XD
只是不知道審查觀看了做何感想
效果應該不大吧XDDD
--
: 專利說明書上面的先前技術,可以拿來引用來打那個專利說明書嗎?
: 也就是拿自己專利說的先前技術來打他自己的專利,聽事務所的人說
: 這個是模糊地帶...每個人解釋都不一樣,看運氣的樣子...@_@?
看到原po的這篇文 讓我想到之前翻譯幾件英說的時候
有人在先前技術第一段寫這樣的文字:
The background description provided herein is for the purpose of generally
presenting the context of the disclosure. Work of the presently named
inventors, to the extent the work is described in this background section,
as well as aspects of the description that may not otherwise qualify as prior
art at the time of filing, are neither expressly nor impliedly admitted as
prior art against the present disclosure.
我翻成:
於此所述之背景內容係一般用以表示本發明之習知技術與本案之前後關係。
就於此背景部分敘述之發明人的作品而言,不應表達或暗示性地被當作核駁本發明之
先前技術,亦不適格作為申請時之先前技術。
所以這段講白一點 就是事先打一支預防針的意思啦XD
只是不知道審查觀看了做何感想
效果應該不大吧XDDD
--
Tags:
專利
All Comments

By Bennie
at 2011-06-22T08:01
at 2011-06-22T08:01

By Tom
at 2011-06-24T21:10
at 2011-06-24T21:10

By Irma
at 2011-06-25T15:45
at 2011-06-25T15:45

By Mason
at 2011-06-27T00:11
at 2011-06-27T00:11

By Emma
at 2011-06-28T18:35
at 2011-06-28T18:35

By Daniel
at 2011-06-29T01:16
at 2011-06-29T01:16

By Ula
at 2011-07-02T03:52
at 2011-07-02T03:52

By Candice
at 2011-07-04T16:48
at 2011-07-04T16:48

By Christine
at 2011-07-09T13:33
at 2011-07-09T13:33

By Joseph
at 2011-07-09T17:35
at 2011-07-09T17:35

By Jessica
at 2011-07-10T10:39
at 2011-07-10T10:39

By Zanna
at 2011-07-12T14:42
at 2011-07-12T14:42

By Elizabeth
at 2011-07-14T11:30
at 2011-07-14T11:30

By Heather
at 2011-07-15T11:22
at 2011-07-15T11:22

By Todd Johnson
at 2011-07-15T22:58
at 2011-07-15T22:58

By Joseph
at 2011-07-16T15:05
at 2011-07-16T15:05

By Kama
at 2011-07-18T06:06
at 2011-07-18T06:06

By Ursula
at 2011-07-19T11:33
at 2011-07-19T11:33

By Irma
at 2011-07-20T10:22
at 2011-07-20T10:22

By Erin
at 2011-07-24T09:33
at 2011-07-24T09:33

By Christine
at 2011-07-29T08:59
at 2011-07-29T08:59

By Todd Johnson
at 2011-07-30T06:16
at 2011-07-30T06:16

By Kelly
at 2011-08-02T07:39
at 2011-08-02T07:39

By Donna
at 2011-08-06T09:31
at 2011-08-06T09:31

By Queena
at 2011-08-08T12:06
at 2011-08-08T12:06

By Steve
at 2011-08-10T01:26
at 2011-08-10T01:26

By Tom
at 2011-08-11T01:51
at 2011-08-11T01:51

By Aaliyah
at 2011-08-11T19:30
at 2011-08-11T19:30

By Carol
at 2011-08-15T04:16
at 2011-08-15T04:16

By Skylar DavisLinda
at 2011-08-17T20:52
at 2011-08-17T20:52

By Liam
at 2011-08-18T04:34
at 2011-08-18T04:34

By Isabella
at 2011-08-20T15:26
at 2011-08-20T15:26

By Ivy
at 2011-08-24T08:20
at 2011-08-24T08:20

By Aaliyah
at 2011-08-26T17:59
at 2011-08-26T17:59

By Franklin
at 2011-08-28T11:09
at 2011-08-28T11:09

By Andrew
at 2011-08-30T15:36
at 2011-08-30T15:36
Related Posts
台灣人民將可參加大陸專利代理人資格考試

By Suhail Hany
at 2011-06-20T17:22
at 2011-06-20T17:22
國外產品沒在台灣申請專利 就沒其他智눠…

By Hazel
at 2011-06-19T06:41
at 2011-06-19T06:41
國外產品沒在台灣申請專利 就沒其他智눠…

By Faithe
at 2011-06-19T06:20
at 2011-06-19T06:20
國外產品沒在台灣申請專利 就沒其他智눠…

By Olga
at 2011-06-18T23:52
at 2011-06-18T23:52
國外產品沒在台灣申請專利 就沒其他智눠…

By Olive
at 2011-06-18T03:15
at 2011-06-18T03:15