補貼 - 經濟
By Edith
at 2008-08-04T00:15
at 2008-08-04T00:15
Table of Contents
※ 引述《MRCool (文)》之銘言:
: 需求Pd=120-Q
: 供給Ps=Q
: 政府從量補貼10元
: 均衡量為65
: 請問一下
: 均衡價格為65還是55元
: why?
: 多謝
原均衡:
Pd = Ps
→ 120-Q = Q
→ 2Q = 120
→ Q* = 60 , P* =60
而在政府對廠商"從量"補貼10元後
會使整條供給線下移(右移)
供給:Ps = Q-10 (Y截距下移10)
就想成廠商在補貼的價格下
原本要在60的價格下才願意生產60單位
但現在只要50的價格
就願意生產60單位了
因為少從消費者那邊收的10元
政府會給
於是產生了新的均衡
Pd = Ps
→ 120-Q = Q-10
→ 2Q = 130
→ Q* = 65 , P* =55
圖解:
補貼前 補貼後
P ↑ P ↑
120-│ S 120-│ S
│╲ / │╲ ╱S'↓
│ ╲ ╱ │ ╲ ╱/
│ ╲ ╱ │ ╲ ╱╱
60-├———╳ 55 _______╲╱
│ ╱︱\ │ ╱╱\
│ ╱ ︱ \ │ ╱╱ | \
│╱ ︱ \D │╱╱ | \
0└───┴────→Q └╱ ──┴───→Q
60 65
--
: 需求Pd=120-Q
: 供給Ps=Q
: 政府從量補貼10元
: 均衡量為65
: 請問一下
: 均衡價格為65還是55元
: why?
: 多謝
原均衡:
Pd = Ps
→ 120-Q = Q
→ 2Q = 120
→ Q* = 60 , P* =60
而在政府對廠商"從量"補貼10元後
會使整條供給線下移(右移)
供給:Ps = Q-10 (Y截距下移10)
就想成廠商在補貼的價格下
原本要在60的價格下才願意生產60單位
但現在只要50的價格
就願意生產60單位了
因為少從消費者那邊收的10元
政府會給
於是產生了新的均衡
Pd = Ps
→ 120-Q = Q-10
→ 2Q = 130
→ Q* = 65 , P* =55
圖解:
補貼前 補貼後
P ↑ P ↑
120-│ S 120-│ S
│╲ / │╲ ╱S'↓
│ ╲ ╱ │ ╲ ╱/
│ ╲ ╱ │ ╲ ╱╱
60-├———╳ 55 _______╲╱
│ ╱︱\ │ ╱╱\
│ ╱ ︱ \ │ ╱╱ | \
│╱ ︱ \D │╱╱ | \
0└───┴────→Q └╱ ──┴───→Q
60 65
--
Tags:
經濟
All Comments
By Andy
at 2008-08-07T05:53
at 2008-08-07T05:53
By Tom
at 2008-08-08T01:03
at 2008-08-08T01:03
By Necoo
at 2008-08-08T23:32
at 2008-08-08T23:32
By David
at 2008-08-12T09:27
at 2008-08-12T09:27
By Skylar Davis
at 2008-08-15T11:49
at 2008-08-15T11:49
By Zenobia
at 2008-08-17T12:12
at 2008-08-17T12:12
By Connor
at 2008-08-22T02:37
at 2008-08-22T02:37
By Rae
at 2008-08-23T13:34
at 2008-08-23T13:34
By Odelette
at 2008-08-23T19:03
at 2008-08-23T19:03
By Faithe
at 2008-08-25T09:53
at 2008-08-25T09:53
By Puput
at 2008-08-28T14:47
at 2008-08-28T14:47
By Kama
at 2008-09-01T15:22
at 2008-09-01T15:22
By Christine
at 2008-09-04T04:30
at 2008-09-04T04:30
By Lily
at 2008-09-06T13:26
at 2008-09-06T13:26
By Charlie
at 2008-09-09T19:49
at 2008-09-09T19:49
By Frederic
at 2008-09-10T06:40
at 2008-09-10T06:40
By Eartha
at 2008-09-11T16:39
at 2008-09-11T16:39
By Zora
at 2008-09-14T08:44
at 2008-09-14T08:44
By Bennie
at 2008-09-17T11:32
at 2008-09-17T11:32
Related Posts
中華郵政
By Zanna
at 2008-08-03T22:17
at 2008-08-03T22:17
補貼
By Kristin
at 2008-08-03T20:45
at 2008-08-03T20:45
兩期生產的分配
By Edward Lewis
at 2008-08-03T15:33
at 2008-08-03T15:33
請勿將Normative Economics偽裝成Postive Economics
By Heather
at 2008-08-02T23:00
at 2008-08-02T23:00
稅改豈只是經濟習題
By Elma
at 2008-08-02T22:27
at 2008-08-02T22:27