關於引用國外OA內容
剛好前陣子處理一個馬來西亞申請案的OA，內容很短，就貼上來給大家參考吧
Your corresponding United States patent no. US X,XXX,XXX B2 has been
granted with claims which are narrower in scope than the present claims
of your Malaysian application, and certain prior art listed on the patent
was considered relevant during prosecution. It therefore appears, prima
facie, that your present claims are not novel and/or inventive as
required by sections 14 and 15 having regard to that prior art and/or do
not clearly define the invention in terms of the technical features as
required by [Reg. 13(1) and 13(5)].
完全不抄US OA，沒有別的理由，就是叫你照著修
這樣算不算有失國格？ 要不要寫信給馬來西亞的專利局局長幹譙一下？
還是申復：請問馬來西亞是美國的一州嗎
ps.拜託不要戰國家
--
剛好前陣子處理一個馬來西亞申請案的OA，內容很短，就貼上來給大家參考吧
Your corresponding United States patent no. US X,XXX,XXX B2 has been
granted with claims which are narrower in scope than the present claims
of your Malaysian application, and certain prior art listed on the patent
was considered relevant during prosecution. It therefore appears, prima
facie, that your present claims are not novel and/or inventive as
required by sections 14 and 15 having regard to that prior art and/or do
not clearly define the invention in terms of the technical features as
required by [Reg. 13(1) and 13(5)].
完全不抄US OA，沒有別的理由，就是叫你照著修
這樣算不算有失國格？ 要不要寫信給馬來西亞的專利局局長幹譙一下？
還是申復：請問馬來西亞是美國的一州嗎
ps.拜託不要戰國家
--
All Comments