請教迴避設計與防範 - 專利
By Hedwig
at 2014-02-16T12:45
at 2014-02-16T12:45
Table of Contents
假設有一個發明是LED array電源控制方法與系統
LED array開始使用過後,光度會衰退。
因此本發明是:
全新的LED,供給電壓 V1。
LED使用一段時間後 (累積 on/off 次數達 N1 後),供給電壓改為 V2,V2 > V1。
初步擬的 claim 如下
1: 1. A power supplying method implemented by an LED array
2: comprising an LED, a voltage supplying unit coupled to the
3: LED, and a counter coupled to the voltage supplying unit,
4: the method comprising:
5: determing that the counter is greater than N1;
6: supplying, by the voltage supplying unit, a voltage V1 to
7: the LED when the counter is not greater than N1;
8: supplying, by the voltage supplying unit, a voltage V2 to
9: the LED when the counter is greater than N1, wherein V2 > V1; and
10: incremeting, by the voltage supplying unit, the counter
11: at the time when the voltage supplying unit supplies a voltage
12: >= V1 to the LED;
想要向各位請教的是
(1) claim 有什麼寫得不好的地方。
(2) 是否有方法,可獲取大部分的功效,又不會落入 claim。
(我覺得很容易想出來)
(3) 假設回到申請階段,如何修改 claim 防堵 (2) 所想出來的方法?
這就像是是矛與盾的問題,先設計出矛,又修改盾來防範。
我個人覺得在專利的世界,盾會贏得勝利吧。
--
LED array開始使用過後,光度會衰退。
因此本發明是:
全新的LED,供給電壓 V1。
LED使用一段時間後 (累積 on/off 次數達 N1 後),供給電壓改為 V2,V2 > V1。
初步擬的 claim 如下
1: 1. A power supplying method implemented by an LED array
2: comprising an LED, a voltage supplying unit coupled to the
3: LED, and a counter coupled to the voltage supplying unit,
4: the method comprising:
5: determing that the counter is greater than N1;
6: supplying, by the voltage supplying unit, a voltage V1 to
7: the LED when the counter is not greater than N1;
8: supplying, by the voltage supplying unit, a voltage V2 to
9: the LED when the counter is greater than N1, wherein V2 > V1; and
10: incremeting, by the voltage supplying unit, the counter
11: at the time when the voltage supplying unit supplies a voltage
12: >= V1 to the LED;
想要向各位請教的是
(1) claim 有什麼寫得不好的地方。
(2) 是否有方法,可獲取大部分的功效,又不會落入 claim。
(我覺得很容易想出來)
(3) 假設回到申請階段,如何修改 claim 防堵 (2) 所想出來的方法?
這就像是是矛與盾的問題,先設計出矛,又修改盾來防範。
我個人覺得在專利的世界,盾會贏得勝利吧。
--
Tags:
專利
All Comments
By Gary
at 2014-02-19T11:06
at 2014-02-19T11:06
By Wallis
at 2014-02-23T03:02
at 2014-02-23T03:02
By Gary
at 2014-02-27T09:44
at 2014-02-27T09:44
By Gary
at 2014-03-02T19:09
at 2014-03-02T19:09
By Erin
at 2014-03-05T15:06
at 2014-03-05T15:06
By Olive
at 2014-03-07T04:07
at 2014-03-07T04:07
By Olive
at 2014-03-10T00:09
at 2014-03-10T00:09
By Hazel
at 2014-03-10T02:14
at 2014-03-10T02:14
By Andy
at 2014-03-14T05:34
at 2014-03-14T05:34
By Vanessa
at 2014-03-14T12:04
at 2014-03-14T12:04
By Faithe
at 2014-03-15T15:19
at 2014-03-15T15:19
By George
at 2014-03-19T18:32
at 2014-03-19T18:32
Related Posts
先有再好?有量再質?還是一次三振?
By Ingrid
at 2014-02-10T19:23
at 2014-02-10T19:23
博拓國際智權
By Audriana
at 2014-02-10T18:43
at 2014-02-10T18:43
DISCLAIMER (排除) 一問 2173.05(i)
By Una
at 2014-02-10T11:11
at 2014-02-10T11:11
3年來首見…去年專利申請件數下滑
By Oliver
at 2014-02-08T05:53
at 2014-02-08T05:53
機械專利師
By Kristin
at 2014-02-07T15:48
at 2014-02-07T15:48