請問這種狀況是不是已經沒有答辯空間了? - 專利

By Bethany
at 2010-12-12T23:37
at 2010-12-12T23:37
Table of Contents
想請問各版友
原說明書
claim 1.一種XX,包含A和B,其中B具有c和/或d.
初審審查委員說c跟d為彼此性質不相類似的擇一形式界定,致申請範圍不明確,並用引證案
來證明"XX包含A和B,其中B具有d"早已是習知的,於是申復時就把d拿掉,變成
claim 1.一種XX,包含A和B,其中B具有c.
然後審查委員說這樣請求範圍乃實質擴大 @____@(初審核駁審定)
請問這樣的狀況如果提再審,還有可能會過嗎><
--
有錢的不是凱子,是凱子他爹阿!
--
原說明書
claim 1.一種XX,包含A和B,其中B具有c和/或d.
初審審查委員說c跟d為彼此性質不相類似的擇一形式界定,致申請範圍不明確,並用引證案
來證明"XX包含A和B,其中B具有d"早已是習知的,於是申復時就把d拿掉,變成
claim 1.一種XX,包含A和B,其中B具有c.
然後審查委員說這樣請求範圍乃實質擴大 @____@(初審核駁審定)
請問這樣的狀況如果提再審,還有可能會過嗎><
--
有錢的不是凱子,是凱子他爹阿!
--
Tags:
專利
All Comments

By Edwina
at 2010-12-17T20:20
at 2010-12-17T20:20

By Mason
at 2010-12-18T11:01
at 2010-12-18T11:01

By Charlie
at 2010-12-19T11:46
at 2010-12-19T11:46

By Callum
at 2010-12-23T20:53
at 2010-12-23T20:53

By Gilbert
at 2010-12-25T07:08
at 2010-12-25T07:08

By Ingrid
at 2010-12-30T01:24
at 2010-12-30T01:24

By William
at 2011-01-03T00:19
at 2011-01-03T00:19

By Puput
at 2011-01-03T21:11
at 2011-01-03T21:11

By Charlie
at 2011-01-04T17:58
at 2011-01-04T17:58

By Jack
at 2011-01-05T01:44
at 2011-01-05T01:44

By Jack
at 2011-01-06T01:50
at 2011-01-06T01:50

By Sandy
at 2011-01-11T01:08
at 2011-01-11T01:08

By Jessica
at 2011-01-14T05:03
at 2011-01-14T05:03
Related Posts
想要投台南的專利工程師

By Emma
at 2010-12-08T22:03
at 2010-12-08T22:03
有關境外公司申請

By Rae
at 2010-12-07T18:23
at 2010-12-07T18:23
100年智財局研發替代役?

By Noah
at 2010-12-06T23:09
at 2010-12-06T23:09
有關於專利說明書的補充修正

By Dora
at 2010-12-06T21:49
at 2010-12-06T21:49
33金32銀32銅 「台灣愛迪生」大勝

By Brianna
at 2010-12-06T08:56
at 2010-12-06T08:56