請問一個專利範圍的問題... - 專利
By Ethan
at 2017-07-12T10:46
at 2017-07-12T10:46
Table of Contents
謝謝大家的回覆...
我先來說一下這個討論的背景:
1. 我是進攻方 (也就是我擁有專利,我要抓侵權,但要先比對標準)
2. 比對的標的是標準(SPEC) (更精確來說是通訊標準)
----------------------
最近在思考以下幾種情況,判斷 Claim 是否有對到標準(SPEC):
(補充,讓問題更聚焦,將問題縮成case 1, 5, 6)
(修改拼錯字:SEPC --> SPEC)
Case 1:
Claim : When condition A is true, object O performs X.
SPEC: When condition A is true and condition B is true, object O performs X.
Case 5:
Claim : if condition A is true, object O performs X.
SPEC: if condition A is true, object O performs X; else object O performs Y.
Case 6:
Claim : if condition A is true, object O performs X; else object O
performs Z.
SPEC: if condition A is true, object O performs X; else object O performs Y.
-----------------
我知道大部分情況可能還是要參考說明書及標準的說明,
但是有沒有就以上這些情況,有邏輯上的判斷?
謝謝。
--
我先來說一下這個討論的背景:
1. 我是進攻方 (也就是我擁有專利,我要抓侵權,但要先比對標準)
2. 比對的標的是標準(SPEC) (更精確來說是通訊標準)
----------------------
最近在思考以下幾種情況,判斷 Claim 是否有對到標準(SPEC):
(補充,讓問題更聚焦,將問題縮成case 1, 5, 6)
(修改拼錯字:SEPC --> SPEC)
Case 1:
Claim : When condition A is true, object O performs X.
SPEC: When condition A is true and condition B is true, object O performs X.
Case 5:
Claim : if condition A is true, object O performs X.
SPEC: if condition A is true, object O performs X; else object O performs Y.
Case 6:
Claim : if condition A is true, object O performs X; else object O
performs Z.
SPEC: if condition A is true, object O performs X; else object O performs Y.
-----------------
我知道大部分情況可能還是要參考說明書及標準的說明,
但是有沒有就以上這些情況,有邏輯上的判斷?
謝謝。
--
Tags:
專利
All Comments
By Liam
at 2017-07-14T14:42
at 2017-07-14T14:42
By Poppy
at 2017-07-16T17:24
at 2017-07-16T17:24
By Wallis
at 2017-07-17T23:33
at 2017-07-17T23:33
By Edward Lewis
at 2017-07-21T02:02
at 2017-07-21T02:02
By Agnes
at 2017-07-25T11:09
at 2017-07-25T11:09
By Agatha
at 2017-07-27T12:48
at 2017-07-27T12:48
By Leila
at 2017-07-29T15:26
at 2017-07-29T15:26
By Blanche
at 2017-07-29T18:56
at 2017-07-29T18:56
By Barb Cronin
at 2017-07-30T00:52
at 2017-07-30T00:52
By Bethany
at 2017-08-03T21:52
at 2017-08-03T21:52
By Sandy
at 2017-08-05T12:54
at 2017-08-05T12:54
By Edwina
at 2017-08-06T01:49
at 2017-08-06T01:49
By Isla
at 2017-08-10T00:18
at 2017-08-10T00:18
By Thomas
at 2017-08-14T03:45
at 2017-08-14T03:45
By Barb Cronin
at 2017-08-15T03:22
at 2017-08-15T03:22
By Barb Cronin
at 2017-08-18T13:42
at 2017-08-18T13:42
By Candice
at 2017-08-19T11:46
at 2017-08-19T11:46
By Donna
at 2017-08-23T16:04
at 2017-08-23T16:04
By Lily
at 2017-08-24T09:11
at 2017-08-24T09:11
By Isla
at 2017-08-27T07:17
at 2017-08-27T07:17
By Dora
at 2017-08-30T21:54
at 2017-08-30T21:54
By Belly
at 2017-09-03T23:42
at 2017-09-03T23:42
By Queena
at 2017-09-08T17:11
at 2017-09-08T17:11
By Puput
at 2017-09-11T03:19
at 2017-09-11T03:19
By Carol
at 2017-09-14T03:27
at 2017-09-14T03:27
By William
at 2017-09-16T16:15
at 2017-09-16T16:15
Related Posts
Waymo LLC v. Uber專利戰:自駕車輛LiDar
By Leila
at 2017-07-12T08:58
at 2017-07-12T08:58
高通要求ITC禁售iPhone 可能波及台灣蘋果
By Tom
at 2017-07-11T10:36
at 2017-07-11T10:36
請問一個專利範圍的問題...
By Robert
at 2017-07-10T14:28
at 2017-07-10T14:28
2017年全球創新指數(GII 2017):瑞士、
By Frederica
at 2017-07-10T11:24
at 2017-07-10T11:24
高考專利師之資格
By Hazel
at 2017-07-08T19:57
at 2017-07-08T19:57