美國前案認定問題 - 專利
![Olive avatar](/img/dog1.jpg)
By Olive
at 2012-10-04T14:28
at 2012-10-04T14:28
Table of Contents
某甲與某乙 於 05/12/2010 申請美國專利 A案
美國審查委員經檢索後
提出 某甲與某丙 於 07/13/2009 提出申請 並主張 05/01/2009 之台灣優先權
並於 11/04/2010 早期公開之引證案 B (美國專利公開案) 為前案
請問 引證 B 是否為符合 USC 102 規定之前案
個人直覺的看法是 發明人相同 又公開未超過一年
(以引證案之美國案申請日來看 也未超過一年) 應可用 Declaration 克服
但是事務所回覆 引證案有主張台灣案優先權(超過一年) 所以不能這樣克服
請問各位先進的看法是.......
補充一下 暫且不論 有相同發明人
就可以用 Declaration 主張 "not by others" 這件事
依據 MPEP 2136.03 的內容
除了 US or PCT (WIPO案) 以外的 Foreign priority date
是不能拿來當作 102(e) 的 Actual filing date (既視感....前不久好像討論過)
所以 "引證案有主張台灣案優先權(超過一年) 因此不能克服" 是哪招??????
--
Tags:
專利
All Comments
![Isabella avatar](/img/woman-biz.jpg)
By Isabella
at 2012-10-07T11:08
at 2012-10-07T11:08
![Leila avatar](/img/woman-glasses.jpg)
By Leila
at 2012-10-10T19:41
at 2012-10-10T19:41
![Xanthe avatar](/img/bee.jpg)
By Xanthe
at 2012-10-15T16:55
at 2012-10-15T16:55
![Jake avatar](/img/beret.jpg)
By Jake
at 2012-10-18T15:25
at 2012-10-18T15:25
![Ursula avatar](/img/woman-ring.jpg)
By Ursula
at 2012-10-21T10:41
at 2012-10-21T10:41
![Damian avatar](/img/boy1.jpg)
By Damian
at 2012-10-25T15:31
at 2012-10-25T15:31
![Jake avatar](/img/boy2.jpg)
By Jake
at 2012-10-30T15:26
at 2012-10-30T15:26
![Skylar Davis avatar](/img/cat1.jpg)
By Skylar Davis
at 2012-11-01T14:45
at 2012-11-01T14:45
![Ophelia avatar](/img/cat2.jpg)
By Ophelia
at 2012-11-01T20:10
at 2012-11-01T20:10
![Linda avatar](/img/cat1.jpg)
By Linda
at 2012-11-03T23:20
at 2012-11-03T23:20
Related Posts
三星‧蘋果專利大戰,勝負在華盛頓游說
![Anthony avatar](/img/cat1.jpg)
By Anthony
at 2012-10-04T07:41
at 2012-10-04T07:41
美國臨時申請案一問
![Ina avatar](/img/girl3.jpg)
By Ina
at 2012-10-03T22:11
at 2012-10-03T22:11
關於台科大專利研究所
![Kristin avatar](/img/cat5.jpg)
By Kristin
at 2012-10-03T17:58
at 2012-10-03T17:58
我要如何申請專利而保有自己的權利
![Ophelia avatar](/img/beaver.jpg)
By Ophelia
at 2012-10-03T11:16
at 2012-10-03T11:16
我要如何申請專利而保有自己的權利
![Tom avatar](/img/dog1.jpg)
By Tom
at 2012-10-02T19:22
at 2012-10-02T19:22