最近的無殼蝸牛怒吼 新聞 - 經濟

By Megan
at 2010-03-26T14:09
at 2010-03-26T14:09
Table of Contents
http://news.chinatimes.com/focus/0,5243,50104796x132010032600942,00.html
我的問題是 如過建商屯積房屋跟地 遲早有天會崩盤的阿
為何無殼蝸牛聯盟要擔心呢
而且釋放國有地越快 應該崩盤的越早(即使中間時期都上揚)才對
還有房屋價格升高 可以降地買屋慾望才對
積極搶進的 不是認為會再漲就是 不會算的(租屋比買屋划算 大家應該都知道)
而且垮下來 可以幫助華人洗清 有土斯有財 土地房屋 買了就不會虧的觀念阿
(歐美的租屋率一直高於持有房屋)
而台灣的情況就算房價崩盤 也不至於出現像美國那種情形吧
受害的應該還是囤屋 投資客 跟 積極搶進 卻沒看清楚的
不太可能導致 全面失業吧
怎看都覺得 無殼蝸牛聯盟的立論沒啥力道
應該是要積極教育人民 拋棄有土斯有財 房屋土地也是會貶值的觀念
或是 改由租而不是買 這樣 長期也可以使房屋租賃市場 進步
而且長期房屋售價也會跌阿
囤屋者 受不了就會釋放房屋進入租屋市場
就算不釋放 最後崩盤也是得利阿(對於買不起房屋的)
怎看都是快點推升價格使其崩盤會比 勸導政府進場干預價格來的快速
是我太單純還是 無殼蝸牛聯盟後面有啥動機?
--
Tags:
經濟
All Comments

By Ursula
at 2010-03-31T05:57
at 2010-03-31T05:57

By Rae
at 2010-04-04T12:32
at 2010-04-04T12:32

By Puput
at 2010-04-06T16:36
at 2010-04-06T16:36

By Hedy
at 2010-04-09T00:40
at 2010-04-09T00:40

By Ethan
at 2010-04-11T06:13
at 2010-04-11T06:13

By Enid
at 2010-04-13T17:55
at 2010-04-13T17:55

By Connor
at 2010-04-16T18:39
at 2010-04-16T18:39

By Dorothy
at 2010-04-21T13:55
at 2010-04-21T13:55

By Kelly
at 2010-04-22T22:17
at 2010-04-22T22:17

By Steve
at 2010-04-24T13:04
at 2010-04-24T13:04

By Quintina
at 2010-04-26T04:01
at 2010-04-26T04:01

By Kelly
at 2010-04-30T10:04
at 2010-04-30T10:04

By Selena
at 2010-04-30T16:03
at 2010-04-30T16:03

By Zora
at 2010-05-04T19:17
at 2010-05-04T19:17

By Irma
at 2010-05-08T11:02
at 2010-05-08T11:02

By Lydia
at 2010-05-11T15:24
at 2010-05-11T15:24

By Valerie
at 2010-05-14T01:17
at 2010-05-14T01:17

By Selena
at 2010-05-18T16:09
at 2010-05-18T16:09

By Kelly
at 2010-05-19T09:08
at 2010-05-19T09:08
Related Posts
朱敬一:經濟學家談生論「死」

By Iris
at 2010-03-26T03:51
at 2010-03-26T03:51
朱敬一:經濟學家談生論「死」

By Quintina
at 2010-03-26T03:25
at 2010-03-26T03:25
經濟學/貨幣供給理論

By Candice
at 2010-03-25T21:21
at 2010-03-25T21:21
經濟學/AS-AD

By Carolina Franco
at 2010-03-25T21:09
at 2010-03-25T21:09
補償變量CV與均等變量EV之判斷

By Regina
at 2010-03-25T16:47
at 2010-03-25T16:47