新興古典 - 經濟

By Puput
at 2009-02-04T19:19

Table of Contents

問題: Without other policy changes, if a permanent decrease happened for the
money supply, which of the following is true?

(A) IS shifed to the left and LM moved up.
(B) IS shifed to the right and LM moved up.
(C) IS shifed to the left and LM moved down.
(D) IS shifed to the right and LM moved down.

答案:A

他說的permanent decrease happened for the money supply
指的是什麼咧? 為什麼IS也會變動~~

最近腦筋愈來愈混沌~@@
麻煩大家看一下~~

--

Tags: 經濟

All Comments

By William
at 2009-02-09T12:11

@@" 題目好詭異

By Olive
at 2009-02-10T16:45

貨幣供給恆常遞減 LM左移(MOVE UP)

By John
at 2009-02-12T12:55

利率升高連帶影響IS 投資意願減少往左移

By Regina
at 2009-02-17T06:19

個人拙見Q Q有錯請指正

By Catherine
at 2009-02-18T21:10

R是內生變數應該是IS上點移動

By Zanna
at 2009-02-22T21:02

真怪XD

By Kumar
at 2009-02-24T16:43

題目很怪..

By James
at 2009-02-27T19:19

實質貨幣餘額減少->消費減少

By Zenobia
at 2009-03-01T00:00

LM左上移後,產出減少,在總和供給需求市
場裡面產生超額需求,AD左移,IS左移

By Dora
at 2009-03-03T01:55

它那個permanent是指LM怎麼了呢?

By Brianna
at 2009-03-06T16:31

LM左上移後,產出減少 https://daxiv.com

經濟學人的文章

By Elma
at 2009-02-04T12:34

這一篇文章，其實已經指出這次經濟為什麼會衰退的這麼嚴重，我認為是很正確的，也是為什麼我一直認為這波經濟衰退的主因是中國而非美國，最近美國終於說出實話，中國操縱匯率，使得美國對中國貿易逆差，當然也歡迎有不同意見提出，我只是認為，讀經濟的應該讀一讀這篇文章。經濟學人:亞洲國家應轉型加強內需更新日期: ...

關於計量的問題

By Anthony
at 2009-02-04T05:35

※ 引述《ichibond3 (123)》之銘言： : 一個AR(1)模型 Xt=B*Xt-1 + Ut : Xt+i為 iid Ut為 white noise : 可得到Var(Xt+Xt-1)=VarX+VarX+2BVarX andlt;== 為什麼可以得到這個結果? : 以上是引用 PHILIPPE ...

關於計量的問題

By Linda
at 2009-02-04T02:18

一個AR(1)模型 Xt=B*Xt-1 + Ut Xt+i為 iid Ut為 white noise 可得到Var(Xt+Xt-1)=VarX+VarX+2BVarX andlt;== 為什麼可以得到這個結果? 以上是引用 PHILIPPE JORION所寫的 Value at Risk 2e 一書 ...

Phillips curve II.

By Kama
at 2009-02-04T01:32

問題: Suppose the anticipated inflation rate is 12 percent and the actual inflation rate is 7 percent. The short-run Phillips curve suggest unemploymen ...

有關貨幣幻覺(Money Illusion)

By John
at 2009-02-04T00:45

想請問一下當以凱因斯學派進行總體分析時在勞動市場上對於貨幣幻覺的假設是不是必要的呢? 因為貨幣幻覺的假設可以免去物價對於勞動供給的影響所以在分析的簡化上是不是才常假設貨幣幻覺呢? 感謝~~ - ...

新興古典 - 經濟

All Comments

Related Posts