啊..... - 保單

By Franklin
at 2006-06-28T11:44
at 2006-06-28T11:44
Table of Contents
雖然 在板上看過很多類似討論
看遇到 還是很生氣
不知道是業務員的問題 還是公司教育訓練的問題
客戶之前全家每個都買一張新x的投資型
有的年繳六萬 有的十二萬
到二年繳費時間過了很久 業務一直不來收保費
結果打電話催好多次才來 業務還說
這種保單很彈性 沒錢繳可以先不繳...鬼勒 誰說沒錢
繳費的時候 還跟客戶要保單 結果第二年都用增額
啊 客戶完全不知道 業務員說 這樣扣的費用比較少
鬼勒 那幹嘛第一年不直接買單筆
這樣除了對業務的佣金有益....還有別的考量嗎??
而且 說法是繳六年 第十年保證領回42萬9.....是怎樣(6萬/年)
繳六年?? 保證??
費用在事前完全沒溝通 很多人收到保單績效才知道繳的十二萬剩沒多少
這時候業務才說 所以才用增額 不然就是 那放著不繳也可以
真的不知道該說什麼....當我們很努力 跟客戶溝通費用問題 長期持有問題
卻有業務員可以這樣推銷投資型
另外想問 x光的投資型 一定要年繳嗎??
續期保費 一定要由業務員收嗎??
--
Tags:
保單
All Comments

By Leila
at 2006-06-28T15:03
at 2006-06-28T15:03

By Ingrid
at 2006-07-02T20:11
at 2006-07-02T20:11

By Emily
at 2006-07-06T20:24
at 2006-07-06T20:24

By Skylar Davis
at 2006-07-09T04:57
at 2006-07-09T04:57

By Mary
at 2006-07-10T14:00
at 2006-07-10T14:00

By Oscar
at 2006-07-11T17:57
at 2006-07-11T17:57

By Noah
at 2006-07-14T10:13
at 2006-07-14T10:13

By Madame
at 2006-07-17T13:45
at 2006-07-17T13:45

By Damian
at 2006-07-18T01:07
at 2006-07-18T01:07

By Irma
at 2006-07-21T14:09
at 2006-07-21T14:09

By Hedda
at 2006-07-24T07:03
at 2006-07-24T07:03

By Noah
at 2006-07-24T23:32
at 2006-07-24T23:32

By George
at 2006-07-29T09:56
at 2006-07-29T09:56

By Queena
at 2006-07-31T08:36
at 2006-07-31T08:36

By Ida
at 2006-08-02T00:59
at 2006-08-02T00:59

By Dinah
at 2006-08-05T20:07
at 2006-08-05T20:07

By Necoo
at 2006-08-06T03:29
at 2006-08-06T03:29

By Caitlin
at 2006-08-08T22:46
at 2006-08-08T22:46

By Ida
at 2006-08-13T15:15
at 2006-08-13T15:15

By Lucy
at 2006-08-17T19:45
at 2006-08-17T19:45

By Belly
at 2006-08-18T16:47
at 2006-08-18T16:47

By Connor
at 2006-08-23T08:21
at 2006-08-23T08:21

By Joseph
at 2006-08-24T14:21
at 2006-08-24T14:21

By Jake
at 2006-08-29T04:24
at 2006-08-29T04:24
Related Posts
為什麼要批投資型保單

By Candice
at 2006-06-25T00:32
at 2006-06-25T00:32
投資型討論有感...

By Heather
at 2006-06-24T23:43
at 2006-06-24T23:43
投資型討論有感...

By Andy
at 2006-06-24T22:12
at 2006-06-24T22:12
有人開車還戴安全帽的嗎?你以為你是開F1賽車嗎?

By Isla
at 2006-06-23T18:34
at 2006-06-23T18:34
這就是補足缺口 與量身訂做?

By Margaret
at 2006-06-23T16:46
at 2006-06-23T16:46