台微體(4152)的吸入式HCQ新冠肺炎解藥? - 股票

Table of Contents


A Strategy to Treat COVID-19 Disease with Targeted Delivery of Inhalable Liposomal Hydroxychloroquine: A Non-clinical Pharmacokinetic Study

原文連結:
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.07.09.196618v1.full


報告介紹如下,全文請見連結

INTRODUCTION
Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), an antimalarial and anti-inflammatory drug, is inexpensive, safe, and well tolerated by most patient populations, including those with chronic diseases or immunocompromised status. HCQ is a weak diprotic base that can pass through the lipid cell membrane and preferentially concentrate in acidic cytoplasmic vesicles. HCQ is being studied to prevent and treat coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), possibly via blocking the interactions between virus and angiotensin-converting
enzyme-2 (ACE-2) receptor as well as sialic acids receptor and has shown potential in vitro (1, 2) and preliminary clinical results (3, 4). As of Jul 8, 2020, a total of 232 studies involves HCQ use among 2478 clinical trials for COVID-19 registered with the clinicaltrials.gov.

However, the effective in vivo levels as well as the optimal dosing regimen of HCQ for treating COVID-19 remains unclear. The in vitro EC50 values (0.72 to 17.31 M) proposed for optimized dosing regimens are based on extracellular drug concentration (1, 2). A higher lung (intracellular) concentration to predict the in vivo antiviral efficacy was suggested (5). The HCQ concentration (6.7 g/mL) required to clear 100% of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro might not be achievable with the currently proposed oral
dosing regimen of 800 mg HCQ sulfate orally daily, followed by a maintenance dose of 400 mg given daily for 4 days (2, 6). Further, a high cumulative doses of HCQ may raise concerns of systemic toxicity, including cardiotoxicity (7).

An alternative strategy is needed to bridge the gap between in vitro and clinical use of a potentially effective agent in the context of COVID-19 pandemic. A drug delivery directly to the respiratory tracts while minimizing the systemic exposure is a desirable alternative (5). In this report, a proof-of-concept study was conducted to evaluate the systemic pharmacokinetics (PK) profiles and tissue distribution following a single dose of inhalable liposomal HCQ in a rat model and compared to that of
unformulated HCQ through intravenous (IV) delivery.



看起來是有新的HCQ相關吸入式的新冠肺炎治療方案,似乎可以降低一般服用的副作用,而且有進行了動物試驗,未來不知有沒有機會也得到BARDA贊助。而文中也有提到這項新藥的廠商是Taiwan Liposome Company,也就是台灣的台微體公司(4152),去看籌碼發現有在公司附近的分點囤了蠻多的貨,覺得事有蹊俏,不知可不可以提前佈局,等待中文新聞出來應該可以拉一波。想請教生技醫療專業的人怎麼解讀這份報告,感謝!!!


-----
Sent from JPTT on my iPhone

--

All Comments

Belly avatarBelly2020-07-19
樓下allin 了
Freda avatarFreda2020-07-22
硬啦硬啦
Frederic avatarFrederic2020-07-25
噴了 是往下
想出脫啊
Irma avatarIrma2020-07-27
remain unclear
Mary avatarMary2020-07-29
吸入性的奎寧 也不過是奎寧啊=.=
Caroline avatarCaroline2020-08-01
股價能不能衝,要問投資人解讀而非專業解讀 XD
Gary avatarGary2020-08-04
機制有可能,但不做不知道,但這個至少要從一期開始
Erin avatarErin2020-08-08
用低劑量奎寧直接作用在發炎最嚴重的肺?
Bethany avatarBethany2020-08-11
但持續吸入的話 順著肺靜脈回到心臟的副作用要注意?
Skylar DavisLinda avatarSkylar DavisLinda2020-08-14
奎寧的作用機制都不明了 不要期待用吸的會多有效
Wallis avatarWallis2020-08-16
什麽都要扯上新冠,好像已沒人說X漢了
George avatarGeorge2020-08-16
太猛 心臟濃度也很低 肺卻能持續作用
Andy avatarAndy2020-08-16
噴噴 往下噴
Emma avatarEmma2020-08-19
吸大痲比較實用
Annie avatarAnnie2020-08-21
都在騙不懂的..