Williamson課本 - 經濟
By Todd Johnson
at 2008-12-15T23:39
at 2008-12-15T23:39
Table of Contents
p.566 第2段:
although money is neutral in the long run, in that a change in the level of
supply has no long-run real effects, changes in the growth rate of the money
supply are not neutral.
我一直不懂這段的意思
它是說"改變貨幣供給數量(長期)不會有實質影響, 但是改變貨幣供給成長率則否"
是這樣的意思嗎?
我覺得怪怪的哩...
意思是 央行每個月增增減減沒有規律的貨幣供給數量只會影響物價水準
而不會影響實質變數 如實質消費、所得、薪資、就業率......
但是如果每期的貨幣供給數量皆為上一期的供給數量乘上某一比率
這樣就會影響實質變數囉?
我的想法是 平常(和緩的)物價膨脹沒有影響 但是惡性物價膨脹會有影響
是這樣嗎?
感謝~
--
although money is neutral in the long run, in that a change in the level of
supply has no long-run real effects, changes in the growth rate of the money
supply are not neutral.
我一直不懂這段的意思
它是說"改變貨幣供給數量(長期)不會有實質影響, 但是改變貨幣供給成長率則否"
是這樣的意思嗎?
我覺得怪怪的哩...
意思是 央行每個月增增減減沒有規律的貨幣供給數量只會影響物價水準
而不會影響實質變數 如實質消費、所得、薪資、就業率......
但是如果每期的貨幣供給數量皆為上一期的供給數量乘上某一比率
這樣就會影響實質變數囉?
我的想法是 平常(和緩的)物價膨脹沒有影響 但是惡性物價膨脹會有影響
是這樣嗎?
感謝~
--
Tags:
經濟
All Comments
By Vanessa
at 2008-12-16T23:44
at 2008-12-16T23:44
By James
at 2008-12-17T09:54
at 2008-12-17T09:54
By Olga
at 2008-12-20T22:30
at 2008-12-20T22:30
By Anonymous
at 2008-12-24T18:46
at 2008-12-24T18:46
By Kama
at 2008-12-25T04:30
at 2008-12-25T04:30
By Freda
at 2008-12-26T06:25
at 2008-12-26T06:25
By George
at 2008-12-29T21:15
at 2008-12-29T21:15
By Anthony
at 2009-01-03T05:44
at 2009-01-03T05:44
By John
at 2009-01-06T13:37
at 2009-01-06T13:37
By Tom
at 2009-01-06T21:05
at 2009-01-06T21:05
By Quintina
at 2009-01-10T23:44
at 2009-01-10T23:44
By Callum
at 2009-01-13T12:09
at 2009-01-13T12:09
Related Posts
會計利潤 與 超額利潤
By Necoo
at 2008-12-15T20:37
at 2008-12-15T20:37
請說明包絡定理
By Tom
at 2008-12-15T20:20
at 2008-12-15T20:20
房貸利率改月調
By Michael
at 2008-12-15T12:41
at 2008-12-15T12:41
經濟學-需求函數的特性
By Enid
at 2008-12-15T09:11
at 2008-12-15T09:11
關於補償變量
By Susan
at 2008-12-15T01:56
at 2008-12-15T01:56