Tesla公布財報,超乎預期賺錢了... - 股票

Table of Contents

※ 引述《ilw4e (可以吃嗎?)》之銘言:
: 推 nzej723yyip: 坐等ilwe4 qwert1122之類的先知們 發表高見一下 10/25 05:56
: 科科還點名我,妖股果然是信徒在買的XD
: 奇怪也就講講tsla的現實而已信徒就不高興了,之前不就只是講這篇:
: #1RP10gsb
: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Stock/M.1533284394.A.DA5.html
: Musk上次就說了會轉虧為盈阿,但怎麼轉的?奇蹟嗎?當然不是,各種會計
: 能玩的手法都用上了阿
: Analyst Erupts At Tesla: "They Used Every Trick From Every Fraud To Put
: Lipstick On Q3 Results"
: https://goo.gl/oUftoa

你找這什麼三流分析師寫的東西?

底下馬上就被人吐嘈了:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ultrasonic:
I am not an analyst but these points are really easy to refute:

- minimal purchase price is $49k. Even for the non AWD models (which cost
$4k more), drivers are purchasing bigger wheels, more expensive paint and
self driving features. More likely average purchase price is mid to high $50k

- SG&A becomes a smaller percentage of revenue as economy of scale kicks in,
like, ahem, making a lot more cars

- depreciation has no bearing on cash flow

- what organization has “certified” that Model 3 is a lemon?

- A/Rs are accelerating due to coming reduction of Fed tax credit by 4QYE.
This was not a factor in 2017

Which firm do you work for as an analyst? Because you are a crappy analyst
and I want to ensure I NEVER take advice from your firm.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

: 重點講幾點:
: 科科,作帳讓營收成長70%,銷售跟行政開支竟然可以-2.9%,原來賣越多車

這裡就會提營收了,講應付帳款時怎麼不敢提?

行政開支減少是因為之前裁員組織再造的結果,這也不知道?

: 越不用費用支出呢
: 應收帳款暴增100%。恩,買車可以先不付錢嗎?為什麼應收帳款會大增呢?

我不曉得你是真不懂還是假不懂

故意只提應收帳款相較於上一季的增加幅度,而不管營收也大增

過去幾季營收與應收帳款的關係:


(千美元) Q3 2017 Q4 2017 Q1 2018 Q2 2018 Q3 2018
營收 2,984,675 3,288,249 3,408,751 4,002,231 6,824,413
應收帳款 607,734 515,381 652,848 569,874 1,155,001

佔比(%) 20.36% 15.67% 19.15% 14.24% 16.92%


應收帳款佔營收的比率 Q3 2018 只有16.92%,與過去一年相比根本是一個很正常的水準

而你卻不管營收大幅度增加,只看應收帳款大幅度增加來質疑?

根本是想唬弄人吧

: 折舊數字%怎麼突然砍半了?過去都營收的12%-14%這季突然變成7%?

折舊上一篇推文我就講過了,不再另外提

--

All Comments

Skylar DavisLinda avatarSkylar DavisLinda2018-10-30
財報本來就是以唬爛過的為準啊?不然呢?
Ethan avatarEthan2018-10-31
推 但你看1F 不管事實多明顯 所有看空仔永遠看不到你
想表達什麼 還以為是要講可轉債 看空仔can't never c
ease to surprise me
Jack avatarJack2018-11-04
推 上篇寫那什麼鬼
Damian avatarDamian2018-11-08
推 空空論點根本薄弱
Eden avatarEden2018-11-13
即便把空空放在百年前汽車產業發展初期也會唱衰它,認為
騎馬才是王道。
Selena avatarSelena2018-11-18
之前產能 現金流沒出來 空空看衰 我也沒話講 但現在
多項疑慮都步入正軌 硬要嘴硬就請拿出證據~
Jack avatarJack2018-11-23
sg&a那個不是比例,是總值-3%
Madame avatarMadame2018-11-23
同意樓上
Nz
Olga avatarOlga2018-11-27
然後那篇講的都是會計帳上做出盈餘,不是講現金流
Christine avatarChristine2018-11-30
看留言也要看在講啥
Blanche avatarBlanche2018-12-02
Acer3000 謝謝泥~
先知又出來啦 你有沒有查過你那篇作者的經歷啊
Thomas avatarThomas2018-12-03
Wallis avatarWallis2018-12-06
謝謝講解
Kelly avatarKelly2018-12-07
這篇合理
Hedda avatarHedda2018-12-08
產能七月底才達標 第三季營收大成長很正常 但空軍還在懷
疑產量造假呢!
Kumar avatarKumar2018-12-12
賣車有應收帳款很正常吧 有人交車是一次付清一兩百萬?