coast fire - 投資
By William
at 2021-07-10T14:39
at 2021-07-10T14:39
Table of Contents
最近閒來無事在yt看到有人分享coast fire 的觀念
突然覺得fire也變太簡單了吧
網上隨便搜一下定義
A person who is on the slow path to financial independence and still needs a job
to one day live the FIRE lifestyle. The job tends to be a low-stress job that p
rovides extra income to cover non-essential living expenses.
Someone who is Coast FIRE can “coast” through his or her job and eventually ob
tain financial independence. To be Coast FIRE, an individual also needs to have
enough saved up so it can grow into a large enough nest egg to live off by age 6
0+ (traditional retirement age).
反正大意是在年輕的時候累積一筆資產,丟進指數化投資30年不動,剩下時間就做剛好可以
打平開支的工作就好
假使退休65歲希望要2000萬
我只要在28歲時存到330萬(抓年化5%)
理論上我在28歲以後只要夠支付生活開銷,到退休時我的330萬就已經變成2000萬
28歲要330乍看很難,但其實如果學歷不太差,在28要存個200萬應該不難,再去信貸100萬
,其實就湊齊300萬
之後28歲之後,你所有的薪水都拿來存頭期款跟還信貸,如果正常家庭夫妻一起出錢,再不
濟35歲以前也能買房吧?
之後人生一毛錢都不用存,全部拿來還房貸跟吃飯,65歲就財富自由了
但人在40-60這段時間附加價值一定最高,薪水遠遠不只還房貸而已,再加上年化抓5%其實
很保守了,如果未來跟過去30年一樣年化報酬一定不只5%。這樣根本不用65歲,搞不好55、
50就退休了,或是像coast fire 最開始的定義一樣,去找個輕鬆的低薪工作即可
這樣看起來只要正常工作,coast fire還滿可行的耶?
好像跟之前流行過的life cycle investing有異曲同工的感覺,如果更堅定相信股市長期向
上,信貸願意拉到200萬更快可以財富自由
不知道這樣的想法有無盲點呢?我自己想到的只有如果通膨持續,2000萬感覺應該不夠退休
…..
--
突然覺得fire也變太簡單了吧
網上隨便搜一下定義
A person who is on the slow path to financial independence and still needs a job
to one day live the FIRE lifestyle. The job tends to be a low-stress job that p
rovides extra income to cover non-essential living expenses.
Someone who is Coast FIRE can “coast” through his or her job and eventually ob
tain financial independence. To be Coast FIRE, an individual also needs to have
enough saved up so it can grow into a large enough nest egg to live off by age 6
0+ (traditional retirement age).
反正大意是在年輕的時候累積一筆資產,丟進指數化投資30年不動,剩下時間就做剛好可以
打平開支的工作就好
假使退休65歲希望要2000萬
我只要在28歲時存到330萬(抓年化5%)
理論上我在28歲以後只要夠支付生活開銷,到退休時我的330萬就已經變成2000萬
28歲要330乍看很難,但其實如果學歷不太差,在28要存個200萬應該不難,再去信貸100萬
,其實就湊齊300萬
之後28歲之後,你所有的薪水都拿來存頭期款跟還信貸,如果正常家庭夫妻一起出錢,再不
濟35歲以前也能買房吧?
之後人生一毛錢都不用存,全部拿來還房貸跟吃飯,65歲就財富自由了
但人在40-60這段時間附加價值一定最高,薪水遠遠不只還房貸而已,再加上年化抓5%其實
很保守了,如果未來跟過去30年一樣年化報酬一定不只5%。這樣根本不用65歲,搞不好55、
50就退休了,或是像coast fire 最開始的定義一樣,去找個輕鬆的低薪工作即可
這樣看起來只要正常工作,coast fire還滿可行的耶?
好像跟之前流行過的life cycle investing有異曲同工的感覺,如果更堅定相信股市長期向
上,信貸願意拉到200萬更快可以財富自由
不知道這樣的想法有無盲點呢?我自己想到的只有如果通膨持續,2000萬感覺應該不夠退休
…..
--
All Comments
By Thomas
at 2021-07-11T21:41
at 2021-07-11T21:41
By Quanna
at 2021-07-12T02:08
at 2021-07-12T02:08
By Xanthe
at 2021-07-16T12:54
at 2021-07-16T12:54
By Damian
at 2021-07-19T08:15
at 2021-07-19T08:15
By Enid
at 2021-07-23T11:32
at 2021-07-23T11:32
By Caroline
at 2021-07-24T05:52
at 2021-07-24T05:52
By Sarah
at 2021-07-28T13:54
at 2021-07-28T13:54
By Victoria
at 2021-08-02T12:09
at 2021-08-02T12:09
By Skylar DavisLinda
at 2021-08-05T05:28
at 2021-08-05T05:28
By Skylar Davis
at 2021-08-07T17:02
at 2021-08-07T17:02
By Jack
at 2021-08-12T03:54
at 2021-08-12T03:54
By Edwina
at 2021-08-14T05:01
at 2021-08-14T05:01
By Una
at 2021-08-18T15:38
at 2021-08-18T15:38
By Carol
at 2021-08-19T21:03
at 2021-08-19T21:03
By Irma
at 2021-08-24T04:14
at 2021-08-24T04:14
Related Posts
損益除以資產=?
By Margaret
at 2021-07-10T13:41
at 2021-07-10T13:41
ARK只推ARKK和ARKW嗎?
By George
at 2021-07-10T11:38
at 2021-07-10T11:38
個人信貸
By Steve
at 2021-07-10T10:07
at 2021-07-10T10:07
個人信貸
By Ingrid
at 2021-07-10T09:38
at 2021-07-10T09:38
竹北房屋估價
By Catherine
at 2021-07-10T07:49
at 2021-07-10T07:49