0050跟00692的內扣費用差異 - 股票

By Kelly
at 2017-12-22T22:41
at 2017-12-22T22:41
Table of Contents
各位股神大家好,想問一下大家
一般ETF強調的就是費用低廉
台灣50之前被詬病也是遲遲不降管理費用
但是剛剛用中華民國證券投資公會的網站查了一下總開銷費用
http://www.sitca.org.tw/ROC/Industry/IN2211.aspx?pid=IN2222_01
為何0050不用手續費(a2)+交易稅(a2),只有經理費的0.03
而00692卻有手續費(a2)0.01+交易稅(a2)0.03,再加經理費=0.01,最後總開銷比0.06(不
懂加起來為何不是0.05是0.06)
之前不是聽說00692內扣比較低嗎?
不過又從mymoney理財網看到,0050 的總管理費用是 0.42 (含 0.10 非管理費用)
而00692沒有資料
https://www.moneydj.com/ETF/X/Basic/Basic0004.xdjhtm?etfid=0050.TW
請問兩者的內扣費用到底哪個高哪的低?這些數據為何結論不一樣?
感謝~
--
Tags:
股票
All Comments

By Zora
at 2017-12-25T17:21
at 2017-12-25T17:21

By Tristan Cohan
at 2017-12-27T00:26
at 2017-12-27T00:26

By Vanessa
at 2017-12-28T12:04
at 2017-12-28T12:04

By Elizabeth
at 2018-01-01T00:08
at 2018-01-01T00:08

By Kumar
at 2018-01-05T09:58
at 2018-01-05T09:58

By Gary
at 2018-01-07T14:29
at 2018-01-07T14:29

By Ida
at 2018-01-09T08:24
at 2018-01-09T08:24

By Candice
at 2018-01-13T00:16
at 2018-01-13T00:16

By Andrew
at 2018-01-17T04:51
at 2018-01-17T04:51

By Callum
at 2018-01-21T12:02
at 2018-01-21T12:02

By Hedy
at 2018-01-23T05:12
at 2018-01-23T05:12

By Kristin
at 2018-01-28T03:11
at 2018-01-28T03:11

By Bennie
at 2018-01-28T12:45
at 2018-01-28T12:45

By Andrew
at 2018-02-01T22:15
at 2018-02-01T22:15

By Kumar
at 2018-02-06T21:44
at 2018-02-06T21:44

By Daniel
at 2018-02-10T11:17
at 2018-02-10T11:17

By Dora
at 2018-02-14T23:36
at 2018-02-14T23:36

By Genevieve
at 2018-02-15T12:50
at 2018-02-15T12:50
Related Posts
晶電雙新助威 營運加溫

By William
at 2017-12-22T22:41
at 2017-12-22T22:41
元太(多

By Gary
at 2017-12-22T21:01
at 2017-12-22T21:01
106年12月22日信用交易統計

By Harry
at 2017-12-22T20:48
at 2017-12-22T20:48
隔日沖做法

By Emily
at 2017-12-22T20:29
at 2017-12-22T20:29
蔡英文:經濟表現超過預期 春天來的時候

By Callum
at 2017-12-22T20:15
at 2017-12-22T20:15