預付型商品與邊際效用 - 經濟

By Robert
at 2008-11-05T12:19
at 2008-11-05T12:19
Table of Contents
今天看到一則新聞,原文如下
http://tw.news.yahoo.com/article/url/d/a/081105/57/18w70.html
裡面有一段說到
預付型消費原本被視為二十一世紀的一項偉大創意,
在先付款再享受商品或勞務的機制下,
它,徹徹底底改寫了經濟學上「邊際效用遞減法則」,
因為,消費者對後面幾次的消費,跟最初一開始的消費,
願意支付相同價格。
想問問大家,這樣的說法有正確嗎?
--
http://tw.news.yahoo.com/article/url/d/a/081105/57/18w70.html
裡面有一段說到
預付型消費原本被視為二十一世紀的一項偉大創意,
在先付款再享受商品或勞務的機制下,
它,徹徹底底改寫了經濟學上「邊際效用遞減法則」,
因為,消費者對後面幾次的消費,跟最初一開始的消費,
願意支付相同價格。
想問問大家,這樣的說法有正確嗎?
--
Tags:
經濟
All Comments

By Jessica
at 2008-11-09T08:16
at 2008-11-09T08:16

By Agnes
at 2008-11-13T22:58
at 2008-11-13T22:58

By Leila
at 2008-11-17T14:26
at 2008-11-17T14:26

By Sierra Rose
at 2008-11-17T16:52
at 2008-11-17T16:52

By Hamiltion
at 2008-11-19T05:37
at 2008-11-19T05:37

By Margaret
at 2008-11-21T05:59
at 2008-11-21T05:59

By Isabella
at 2008-11-24T17:58
at 2008-11-24T17:58

By Charlie
at 2008-11-25T15:44
at 2008-11-25T15:44
Related Posts
淺析宋朝的經濟繁榮

By Harry
at 2008-11-05T11:01
at 2008-11-05T11:01
有沒有經濟侵略這種東西...

By Sierra Rose
at 2008-11-05T09:28
at 2008-11-05T09:28
完全競爭的問題

By Selena
at 2008-11-05T00:42
at 2008-11-05T00:42
淺析宋朝的經濟繁榮

By Rosalind
at 2008-11-05T00:14
at 2008-11-05T00:14
無異曲線的問題

By Adele
at 2008-11-04T21:20
at 2008-11-04T21:20