關於避險 - 期貨
By Annie
at 2007-09-22T03:33
at 2007-09-22T03:33
Table of Contents
12萬現貨需要避險??
不管是不是權值股,我覺得都沒有那個價值!!
避險最大用意就是在減少損失,而非曝露更多風險來賺取利益
就12萬的現貨來說,我覺得:
1. 資金部位波動太小了...避險沒有意義
就算連續三根跌停,那也不過小賠24000
選擇賣出call 或者 買進put 或者放空大小台指....
都存在太大太大的不確定性,這就會變成曝險!!
我倒是建議,
如果他是好股票,逢低應加碼
如果他是投機的股票,下殺應善設停損
否則會變成現貨期貨雙巴俠!!
2. 股票標的物和期貨避險資金的比重相差太近...
槓桿太小,到底是哪邊要避險阿??
到時候反而有可能因為期貨避險單而賠更大!!
再加上股票標的物和指數之間的相關係數並不了解的話
這種避險幾乎等於賭博!!
如果原PO只是想用12萬穩定賺錢的話,
學會選擇權的一些操作策略應該比你去思考如何用期貨避險還要來的簡單
保守一點作賣方,一個月要穩定獲利10-20%,其實並不難!
說實在的小錢想在股市賺錢,真的很累!!
我倒建議買基金當作強迫存款,到一定程度再領出來自己操作.....
可能會比用12萬然後卻每天掙扎好很多......
--
Tags:
期貨
All Comments
By Necoo
at 2007-09-25T20:23
at 2007-09-25T20:23
By Elma
at 2007-09-27T14:00
at 2007-09-27T14:00
By Joe
at 2007-09-29T19:13
at 2007-09-29T19:13
By Erin
at 2007-10-02T04:53
at 2007-10-02T04:53
By Carol
at 2007-10-06T04:31
at 2007-10-06T04:31
By Ethan
at 2007-10-06T22:40
at 2007-10-06T22:40
By Lucy
at 2007-10-09T06:36
at 2007-10-09T06:36
By Todd Johnson
at 2007-10-12T01:34
at 2007-10-12T01:34
By Adele
at 2007-10-13T10:06
at 2007-10-13T10:06
By David
at 2007-10-16T03:19
at 2007-10-16T03:19
By Jake
at 2007-10-19T23:06
at 2007-10-19T23:06
By Jack
at 2007-10-22T08:16
at 2007-10-22T08:16
By Ethan
at 2007-10-23T00:57
at 2007-10-23T00:57
By Connor
at 2007-10-24T01:02
at 2007-10-24T01:02
By Elizabeth
at 2007-10-24T02:22
at 2007-10-24T02:22
By Emma
at 2007-10-24T11:51
at 2007-10-24T11:51
By Audriana
at 2007-10-24T23:36
at 2007-10-24T23:36
By Jack
at 2007-10-25T03:00
at 2007-10-25T03:00
By Rachel
at 2007-10-27T06:36
at 2007-10-27T06:36
By Charlotte
at 2007-10-31T08:35
at 2007-10-31T08:35
By Hedy
at 2007-11-01T09:45
at 2007-11-01T09:45
By Agnes
at 2007-11-02T07:46
at 2007-11-02T07:46
By Andy
at 2007-11-03T11:23
at 2007-11-03T11:23
Related Posts
今天看到一句不錯的話
By Lily
at 2007-09-20T22:42
at 2007-09-20T22:42
股市的利率風險
By Ethan
at 2007-09-20T17:03
at 2007-09-20T17:03
結算落點計算
By John
at 2007-09-20T16:34
at 2007-09-20T16:34
選擇權履約分享
By Blanche
at 2007-09-20T11:32
at 2007-09-20T11:32
大盤買賣差、均買均賣如何看
By Necoo
at 2007-09-17T11:56
at 2007-09-17T11:56