請問現貨還會創新高嗎?@@ - 期貨

By Ida
at 2009-06-25T09:58
at 2009-06-25T09:58
Table of Contents
※ [本文轉錄自 Stock 看板]
作者: Angraecum (風蘭) 看板: Stock
標題: Re: [請益] 請問現貨還會創新高嗎?@@
時間: Wed Jun 24 17:28:18 2009
________________________________________________________ 7084 ____
█
█ █ ← 雙鴉懸空
█ █
∣ ∣
█ _________________________________________ 6907 ____
∣ █ ┌┐█
█ █└┘█ ← 三線反黑
∣ ∣ █----------------------------------------- 6768 ----
∣ █
█ ______________________________________ 6640 ____
█ _____________________________ 6586 ____
█ ┌┐█ 月均線 6527
█ ╪││█ _____ 6511 ____
█ ∣││█ ∣
∣└┘ ∣
∣ ┌┐
█ ┌┐ ││
█ ││ ││
█ ∣ ││∣││季線 6222
∣ ╪ █ █┌┐└┘┴└┘--- 6191 ----
∣ █└┘
∣_________________ 6100 ____
-------------------------------------------- 月線多方缺口下緣 6071 ----
-------------------------------------------- 日線多方缺口下緣 5995 ----
圖示.現貨 980601 至 980624 日線圖
前回盤勢預期,現貨將在 5995 點至 6256 點間試圖作止跌,而近日現貨
也延著緩步上移的季線作盤局整理,至今日多方初步量增表態作轉強,今
收盤站上頸線 6339 點,也封閉了昨日形成之分線空方缺口,而多方今盤
中意圖封閉 6383 點至 6443 點的日線空方缺口,但上逢空方抵抗而封閉
失敗,收盤留下上影線,就量價線三法來看,多方量增價揚唯線不純,結
構上屬多方略強,也因今日多方量增作攻擊,讓盤勢初現止跌線,今日高
點 6511 點近上檔月均線 6527 點壓力而復返,而近日盤勢低點始終在季
線附近止跌作多方防守,再觀今日各期指,唯金融期量僳線三法同步反多
為最強勢,但電子期、非金電指數成多空平分,多方沒有明確優勢,仍處
多空拉鋸狀態,就三大期指的量價線結構作預期,明日盤勢雖仍有高點,
但電子、傳產將成盤局,唯金融多方撐盤,因此明日盤勢高點有限,應以
區間盤局作結機會較高,而近日盤勢皆處於低量,推測盤勢後續欲連續呈
現量增並不容易,因此短日內盤勢亦以低量作區間整理的可能性高,而多
方量能不出便無力化解上檔重重壓力,盤勢唯有持續量增方可再成有效漲
勢,而今之多方初步表態線為盤勢止跌之確認線,所以後續多方必需力守
今低 6191 點不破方對多方有利,而量能不出後續今高 6511 點亦不易作
突破,也就是說,今日之高低點,便為後續盤勢橫盤整理之可能區間,操
作上,今低不破逢回作多,今低跌破多方退場觀望,若以均線的角度說明
,個人認為盤勢近日會在季線與月均線之間走收斂,等待多空再次表態攻
擊,但對多方而言,攻擊一定要帶量,盤勢量縮走漲高點不高,見此多單
不可任意追價,逢回作多方為上策。
而當今日高低價之區間突破後的盤勢可能演變,若今低摜破,也意味著季
線跌破,此則 5995 點便有機會一見,反之,若多方量增突破今日高點,
則後續多方就有機會來探 6640 點之壓力,也就是「三線反黑」下緣的位
置,至於走何種途徑機會高?個人認為,就目前盤勢量價線結構來看,盤
勢對多方略為有利,也就是說,個人認為今日高點會被突破,至 6640 點
附近後,盤勢才會有再次空方抵抗力道出現,操作上個人會偏多思維,但
以低接不追價為軸,今低跌破則指數多單觀望不作多,個股的停損停利點
則另作規劃,本文之預期以盤勢為主,但僅為個人推測而非必然,觀文者
請三思而後行。
--
夜空に星が瞬くように
溶けたこころは離れない
たとえこの手が離れても
ふたりがそれを忘れぬ限り…
--
作者: Angraecum (風蘭) 看板: Stock
標題: Re: [請益] 請問現貨還會創新高嗎?@@
時間: Wed Jun 24 17:28:18 2009
________________________________________________________ 7084 ____
█
█ █ ← 雙鴉懸空
█ █
∣ ∣
█ _________________________________________ 6907 ____
∣ █ ┌┐█
█ █└┘█ ← 三線反黑
∣ ∣ █----------------------------------------- 6768 ----
∣ █
█ ______________________________________ 6640 ____
█ _____________________________ 6586 ____
█ ┌┐█ 月均線 6527
█ ╪││█ _____ 6511 ____
█ ∣││█ ∣
∣└┘ ∣
∣ ┌┐
█ ┌┐ ││
█ ││ ││
█ ∣ ││∣││季線 6222
∣ ╪ █ █┌┐└┘┴└┘--- 6191 ----
∣ █└┘
∣_________________ 6100 ____
-------------------------------------------- 月線多方缺口下緣 6071 ----
-------------------------------------------- 日線多方缺口下緣 5995 ----
圖示.現貨 980601 至 980624 日線圖
前回盤勢預期,現貨將在 5995 點至 6256 點間試圖作止跌,而近日現貨
也延著緩步上移的季線作盤局整理,至今日多方初步量增表態作轉強,今
收盤站上頸線 6339 點,也封閉了昨日形成之分線空方缺口,而多方今盤
中意圖封閉 6383 點至 6443 點的日線空方缺口,但上逢空方抵抗而封閉
失敗,收盤留下上影線,就量價線三法來看,多方量增價揚唯線不純,結
構上屬多方略強,也因今日多方量增作攻擊,讓盤勢初現止跌線,今日高
點 6511 點近上檔月均線 6527 點壓力而復返,而近日盤勢低點始終在季
線附近止跌作多方防守,再觀今日各期指,唯金融期量僳線三法同步反多
為最強勢,但電子期、非金電指數成多空平分,多方沒有明確優勢,仍處
多空拉鋸狀態,就三大期指的量價線結構作預期,明日盤勢雖仍有高點,
但電子、傳產將成盤局,唯金融多方撐盤,因此明日盤勢高點有限,應以
區間盤局作結機會較高,而近日盤勢皆處於低量,推測盤勢後續欲連續呈
現量增並不容易,因此短日內盤勢亦以低量作區間整理的可能性高,而多
方量能不出便無力化解上檔重重壓力,盤勢唯有持續量增方可再成有效漲
勢,而今之多方初步表態線為盤勢止跌之確認線,所以後續多方必需力守
今低 6191 點不破方對多方有利,而量能不出後續今高 6511 點亦不易作
突破,也就是說,今日之高低點,便為後續盤勢橫盤整理之可能區間,操
作上,今低不破逢回作多,今低跌破多方退場觀望,若以均線的角度說明
,個人認為盤勢近日會在季線與月均線之間走收斂,等待多空再次表態攻
擊,但對多方而言,攻擊一定要帶量,盤勢量縮走漲高點不高,見此多單
不可任意追價,逢回作多方為上策。
而當今日高低價之區間突破後的盤勢可能演變,若今低摜破,也意味著季
線跌破,此則 5995 點便有機會一見,反之,若多方量增突破今日高點,
則後續多方就有機會來探 6640 點之壓力,也就是「三線反黑」下緣的位
置,至於走何種途徑機會高?個人認為,就目前盤勢量價線結構來看,盤
勢對多方略為有利,也就是說,個人認為今日高點會被突破,至 6640 點
附近後,盤勢才會有再次空方抵抗力道出現,操作上個人會偏多思維,但
以低接不追價為軸,今低跌破則指數多單觀望不作多,個股的停損停利點
則另作規劃,本文之預期以盤勢為主,但僅為個人推測而非必然,觀文者
請三思而後行。
--
夜空に星が瞬くように
溶けたこころは離れない
たとえこの手が離れても
ふたりがそれを忘れぬ限り…
--
Tags:
期貨
All Comments

By Delia
at 2009-06-25T22:45
at 2009-06-25T22:45

By Frederica
at 2009-06-28T17:39
at 2009-06-28T17:39

By Elma
at 2009-07-03T14:31
at 2009-07-03T14:31

By Frederic
at 2009-07-06T10:04
at 2009-07-06T10:04

By Quanna
at 2009-07-10T12:56
at 2009-07-10T12:56

By Franklin
at 2009-07-13T09:16
at 2009-07-13T09:16

By Candice
at 2009-07-15T02:44
at 2009-07-15T02:44

By Olga
at 2009-07-19T09:54
at 2009-07-19T09:54

By Valerie
at 2009-07-22T21:31
at 2009-07-22T21:31

By Vanessa
at 2009-07-23T21:35
at 2009-07-23T21:35

By Cara
at 2009-07-24T12:30
at 2009-07-24T12:30

By Charlotte
at 2009-07-25T06:51
at 2009-07-25T06:51

By Aaliyah
at 2009-07-26T06:48
at 2009-07-26T06:48

By Robert
at 2009-07-30T20:15
at 2009-07-30T20:15

By Harry
at 2009-08-03T19:10
at 2009-08-03T19:10

By Margaret
at 2009-08-07T00:48
at 2009-08-07T00:48

By Doris
at 2009-08-09T09:32
at 2009-08-09T09:32

By Heather
at 2009-08-10T18:17
at 2009-08-10T18:17

By Una
at 2009-08-15T00:04
at 2009-08-15T00:04

By Linda
at 2009-08-19T10:37
at 2009-08-19T10:37

By Tristan Cohan
at 2009-08-20T20:32
at 2009-08-20T20:32

By Sierra Rose
at 2009-08-20T22:02
at 2009-08-20T22:02

By Bennie
at 2009-08-25T12:30
at 2009-08-25T12:30

By Kama
at 2009-08-30T05:02
at 2009-08-30T05:02

By William
at 2009-08-30T14:47
at 2009-08-30T14:47

By Cara
at 2009-09-01T21:04
at 2009-09-01T21:04

By Elma
at 2009-09-05T07:38
at 2009-09-05T07:38

By Sierra Rose
at 2009-09-05T21:27
at 2009-09-05T21:27

By George
at 2009-09-06T07:40
at 2009-09-06T07:40

By Sierra Rose
at 2009-09-10T12:51
at 2009-09-10T12:51

By Dora
at 2009-09-12T07:27
at 2009-09-12T07:27

By Cara
at 2009-09-15T03:46
at 2009-09-15T03:46

By Rebecca
at 2009-09-15T13:11
at 2009-09-15T13:11

By Quintina
at 2009-09-18T12:57
at 2009-09-18T12:57

By Daph Bay
at 2009-09-20T09:53
at 2009-09-20T09:53

By Linda
at 2009-09-21T04:06
at 2009-09-21T04:06

By Olivia
at 2009-09-24T12:38
at 2009-09-24T12:38

By Delia
at 2009-09-25T02:17
at 2009-09-25T02:17

By Joseph
at 2009-09-28T20:22
at 2009-09-28T20:22

By Joseph
at 2009-10-01T23:06
at 2009-10-01T23:06

By Erin
at 2009-10-06T05:42
at 2009-10-06T05:42

By Steve
at 2009-10-07T16:59
at 2009-10-07T16:59

By Todd Johnson
at 2009-10-10T08:41
at 2009-10-10T08:41

By Iris
at 2009-10-14T19:21
at 2009-10-14T19:21

By Zenobia
at 2009-10-17T02:05
at 2009-10-17T02:05

By Ida
at 2009-10-21T09:01
at 2009-10-21T09:01

By Rebecca
at 2009-10-21T20:30
at 2009-10-21T20:30

By Olive
at 2009-10-23T02:19
at 2009-10-23T02:19

By Rosalind
at 2009-10-24T04:24
at 2009-10-24T04:24

By Gary
at 2009-10-27T21:06
at 2009-10-27T21:06

By Puput
at 2009-10-29T01:26
at 2009-10-29T01:26

By Agatha
at 2009-10-29T21:55
at 2009-10-29T21:55

By Ursula
at 2009-10-30T22:25
at 2009-10-30T22:25

By Hedwig
at 2009-10-31T12:28
at 2009-10-31T12:28

By Eartha
at 2009-11-02T14:00
at 2009-11-02T14:00

By Hardy
at 2009-11-04T12:00
at 2009-11-04T12:00

By Tristan Cohan
at 2009-11-07T16:42
at 2009-11-07T16:42

By Suhail Hany
at 2009-11-09T09:08
at 2009-11-09T09:08

By Aaliyah
at 2009-11-11T02:07
at 2009-11-11T02:07

By Hedwig
at 2009-11-11T09:58
at 2009-11-11T09:58

By Agatha
at 2009-11-14T13:25
at 2009-11-14T13:25

By Vanessa
at 2009-11-18T07:57
at 2009-11-18T07:57

By Olga
at 2009-11-22T23:08
at 2009-11-22T23:08

By Isabella
at 2009-11-25T05:13
at 2009-11-25T05:13

By Edward Lewis
at 2009-11-29T06:11
at 2009-11-29T06:11

By Edwina
at 2009-12-03T05:13
at 2009-12-03T05:13

By Quanna
at 2009-12-07T06:13
at 2009-12-07T06:13

By Necoo
at 2009-12-10T15:39
at 2009-12-10T15:39

By Lydia
at 2009-12-13T06:09
at 2009-12-13T06:09

By Brianna
at 2009-12-16T08:17
at 2009-12-16T08:17

By Quintina
at 2009-12-17T13:36
at 2009-12-17T13:36

By Aaliyah
at 2009-12-17T18:12
at 2009-12-17T18:12

By Caitlin
at 2009-12-21T15:32
at 2009-12-21T15:32

By Todd Johnson
at 2009-12-25T18:56
at 2009-12-25T18:56

By Cara
at 2009-12-28T00:39
at 2009-12-28T00:39

By Lily
at 2009-12-29T23:10
at 2009-12-29T23:10

By Enid
at 2010-01-01T20:10
at 2010-01-01T20:10

By Candice
at 2010-01-03T14:00
at 2010-01-03T14:00

By Dinah
at 2010-01-04T20:42
at 2010-01-04T20:42

By Yedda
at 2010-01-08T12:43
at 2010-01-08T12:43

By Jacky
at 2010-01-08T21:40
at 2010-01-08T21:40

By Annie
at 2010-01-10T01:11
at 2010-01-10T01:11
Related Posts
感覺板上大多數板友大部分是玩op?

By Zora
at 2009-06-25T09:51
at 2009-06-25T09:51
手續費有可能是負的嗎?

By Candice
at 2009-06-25T07:14
at 2009-06-25T07:14
手續費有可能是負的嗎?

By Charlotte
at 2009-06-25T01:58
at 2009-06-25T01:58
2009.06.25 盤中閒聊

By Annie
at 2009-06-25T00:05
at 2009-06-25T00:05
98-06-24 OI簡表

By Elizabeth
at 2009-06-24T22:25
at 2009-06-24T22:25