請問減稅廣告中傅利曼的那段話 - 經濟
By Jack
at 2008-09-05T00:46
at 2008-09-05T00:46
Table of Contents
※ 引述《aoc760615 (腦殘大魔王)》之銘言:
: 雖然知道那是斷章取義所下之結論
: 但有人知道傅利曼本人是在何種情況說出那句話的嗎?
: 既然傅利曼為貨幣主義經濟學家,怎麼會支持減稅呢?
這關連在哪?
: 那整句話的原意為何呢?
From Wiliquote
http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Milton_Friedman
I am in favor of cutting taxes under any circumstances and for any excuse,
for any reason, whenever it's possible.
不管在什麼情況下或任何理由、藉口,我都偏愛減稅。
The reason I am is because I believe the big problem is not taxes, the big
problem is spending. The question is, "How do you hold down government
spending?" Government spending now amounts to close to 40% of national income
not counting indirect spending through regulation and the like.
If you include that, you get up to roughly half.
因為我相信最大的問題並不在稅收,問題在於支出。
問題是「我們該怎麼降低政府支出?」
不算間接支出或管制之類的,政府支出現在占了將近國民所得的百分之四十;
如果都算進去的話,那就將近有一半了。
The real danger we face is that number will creep up and up and up.
The only effective way I think to hold it down, is to hold down the amount
of income the government has. The way to do that is to cut taxes.
我們面對的真正危機是這些數字會一直慢慢增加增加再增加。
唯一有效率的方法,我想是把它降低,降低到政府所有擁有的錢那麼多。
作到這點的方法就是減稅。
--
Vangel如是說:
『每個夢想成為棒球選手的小孩子都會拿著球棒站在院子裡,
個板 Ptt2 告訴自己「世界大賽第七戰,九局下,滿壘」,
peorthrind 然後夢想自己打出致勝全壘打。
http://www.wretch.cc/blog/peorthrind 我的工作就是粉碎這個夢想。』
--
: 雖然知道那是斷章取義所下之結論
: 但有人知道傅利曼本人是在何種情況說出那句話的嗎?
: 既然傅利曼為貨幣主義經濟學家,怎麼會支持減稅呢?
這關連在哪?
: 那整句話的原意為何呢?
From Wiliquote
http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Milton_Friedman
I am in favor of cutting taxes under any circumstances and for any excuse,
for any reason, whenever it's possible.
不管在什麼情況下或任何理由、藉口,我都偏愛減稅。
The reason I am is because I believe the big problem is not taxes, the big
problem is spending. The question is, "How do you hold down government
spending?" Government spending now amounts to close to 40% of national income
not counting indirect spending through regulation and the like.
If you include that, you get up to roughly half.
因為我相信最大的問題並不在稅收,問題在於支出。
問題是「我們該怎麼降低政府支出?」
不算間接支出或管制之類的,政府支出現在占了將近國民所得的百分之四十;
如果都算進去的話,那就將近有一半了。
The real danger we face is that number will creep up and up and up.
The only effective way I think to hold it down, is to hold down the amount
of income the government has. The way to do that is to cut taxes.
我們面對的真正危機是這些數字會一直慢慢增加增加再增加。
唯一有效率的方法,我想是把它降低,降低到政府所有擁有的錢那麼多。
作到這點的方法就是減稅。
--
Vangel如是說:
『每個夢想成為棒球選手的小孩子都會拿著球棒站在院子裡,
個板 Ptt2 告訴自己「世界大賽第七戰,九局下,滿壘」,
peorthrind 然後夢想自己打出致勝全壘打。
http://www.wretch.cc/blog/peorthrind 我的工作就是粉碎這個夢想。』
--
Tags:
經濟
All Comments
By Bethany
at 2008-09-05T09:21
at 2008-09-05T09:21
By Rosalind
at 2008-09-06T09:36
at 2008-09-06T09:36
By Bethany
at 2008-09-09T02:58
at 2008-09-09T02:58
By Charlie
at 2008-09-09T07:29
at 2008-09-09T07:29
By Edward Lewis
at 2008-09-12T23:23
at 2008-09-12T23:23
By Quintina
at 2008-09-15T01:23
at 2008-09-15T01:23
By Edward Lewis
at 2008-09-15T18:02
at 2008-09-15T18:02
Related Posts
跨期消費理論-比較靜態分析
By Rachel
at 2008-09-03T21:44
at 2008-09-03T21:44
勞團警告 錢進中國 失業更嚴重
By Olivia
at 2008-09-02T09:31
at 2008-09-02T09:31
來推薦書吧!
By Mia
at 2008-09-01T23:08
at 2008-09-01T23:08
經濟學有關第一級價格歧視
By Kelly
at 2008-09-01T17:47
at 2008-09-01T17:47
財金知識小測驗
By Skylar DavisLinda
at 2008-09-01T16:11
at 2008-09-01T16:11