美國專利無效判決的拘束力 - 專利

By Olivia
at 2009-03-18T18:28
at 2009-03-18T18:28
Table of Contents
抱歉 問這種蠢問題
由於小弟日前與客戶(老客戶,都變成朋友了= =)談論某專利訴訟時
提及
「若在美國專利訴訟中,專利被判決無效(invalid),
則專利權人日後亦不得再對第三人主張其專利權。」
可是客戶卻說他的認知不是如此,
他印象中:
「美國專利訴訟中的無效判決,僅對該訴訟有拘束力,
不具『對世效力』。」
要不然就變成司法權去侵害行政權了。
可是,我從來都是記得我的說法才是正確的:
美國專利訴訟,法院判決無效的話,是有『對世效力』的。
請問各位大大,到底哪個說法才是正確的呢?
又,若是我的說法才是對的話,
請問是否有程序法上的明文規定?
(我在35USC和37CFR裡好像沒找到...不過也有可能是我英文太爛看不懂orz)
先在這裡感謝各位大大了 m(_ _)m
--
Tags:
專利
All Comments

By Joe
at 2009-03-19T03:21
at 2009-03-19T03:21

By Odelette
at 2009-03-22T01:38
at 2009-03-22T01:38

By Rebecca
at 2009-03-23T18:27
at 2009-03-23T18:27

By Harry
at 2009-03-26T03:14
at 2009-03-26T03:14

By Skylar DavisLinda
at 2009-03-28T13:37
at 2009-03-28T13:37

By Rosalind
at 2009-03-30T21:08
at 2009-03-30T21:08

By Una
at 2009-04-02T15:47
at 2009-04-02T15:47

By Emily
at 2009-04-03T06:26
at 2009-04-03T06:26

By Lily
at 2009-04-07T00:19
at 2009-04-07T00:19

By Donna
at 2009-04-08T16:57
at 2009-04-08T16:57

By Oliver
at 2009-04-09T14:30
at 2009-04-09T14:30

By Kelly
at 2009-04-10T23:31
at 2009-04-10T23:31

By Dora
at 2009-04-14T17:40
at 2009-04-14T17:40

By Agatha
at 2009-04-17T12:48
at 2009-04-17T12:48

By Mason
at 2009-04-21T03:09
at 2009-04-21T03:09

By Frederic
at 2009-04-24T18:01
at 2009-04-24T18:01

By Rebecca
at 2009-04-28T07:03
at 2009-04-28T07:03

By Christine
at 2009-05-02T03:39
at 2009-05-02T03:39

By Susan
at 2009-05-04T03:40
at 2009-05-04T03:40

By Aaliyah
at 2009-05-04T16:16
at 2009-05-04T16:16

By Frederic
at 2009-05-09T08:15
at 2009-05-09T08:15

By Selena
at 2009-05-13T17:47
at 2009-05-13T17:47

By Xanthe
at 2009-05-14T09:45
at 2009-05-14T09:45
Related Posts
[新聞] A380機艙餐廳降落台北 前空姐上딠…

By Hazel
at 2009-03-16T15:18
at 2009-03-16T15:18
展示機 的英文怎麼說?

By Edwina
at 2009-03-15T02:09
at 2009-03-15T02:09
請問有人聽過博大國際智權公司嗎...?

By Ursula
at 2009-03-14T11:54
at 2009-03-14T11:54
請問有人聽過博大國際智權公司嗎...?

By Carol
at 2009-03-13T13:13
at 2009-03-13T13:13
請問Inhouse的工程師們

By Necoo
at 2009-03-13T00:44
at 2009-03-13T00:44