美國專利Claim寫法的要求 - 專利
By Mason
at 2014-04-30T10:50
at 2014-04-30T10:50
Table of Contents
※ 引述《deathcustom (1982-2013 END)》之銘言:
: 標題: Re: [問題] 美國專利Claim寫法的要求
: 時間: Tue Apr 29 22:38:27 2014
:
: 37 CFR 1.83: Content of Drawing
:
: (a)
: The drawing in a nonprovisional application must show every feature of
: the invention specified in the claims.
可能是我英文不好。
請教一下,就(a)的第一句來看:
大意應該是"NPA中的圖示必須繪出claim中的每一個發明特徵"。
不知道是如何導出"每個claim必需要有圖示"這樣的說法?
可否方便明示一下?
: However, conventional features
: disclosed in the description and claims, where their detailed
: illustration is not essential for a proper understanding of the
: invention, should be illustrated in the drawing in the form of a
: graphical drawing symbol or a labeled representation (e.g., a labeled
: rectangular box). In addition, tables and sequence listings that are
: included in the specification are, except for applications filed under
: 35 U.S.C. 371, not permitted to be included in the drawings.
:
: (c)
: Where the drawings in a nonprovisional application do not comply with
: the requirements of paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, the examiner
: shall require such additional illustration within a time period of not
: less than two months from the date of the sending of a notice thereof.
: Such corrections are subject to the requirements of § 1.81(d).
:
: 37 CFR 1.81 (d)
: Drawings submitted after the filing date of the application may not be
: used to overcome any insufficiency of the specification due to lack of
: an enabling disclosure or otherwise inadequate disclosure therein, or to
: supplement the original disclosure thereof for the purpose of
: interpretation of the scope of any claim.
:
:
: 除非說明書說地夠清楚了,要不然要補充圖式是很困難的
:
: 而1.83(a)規定了想寫進claim的發明(能用圖表示的)都要畫成圖
:
--
樂創意
飆創新
玩專利
超過癮
--
: 標題: Re: [問題] 美國專利Claim寫法的要求
: 時間: Tue Apr 29 22:38:27 2014
:
: 37 CFR 1.83: Content of Drawing
:
: (a)
: The drawing in a nonprovisional application must show every feature of
: the invention specified in the claims.
可能是我英文不好。
請教一下,就(a)的第一句來看:
大意應該是"NPA中的圖示必須繪出claim中的每一個發明特徵"。
不知道是如何導出"每個claim必需要有圖示"這樣的說法?
可否方便明示一下?
: However, conventional features
: disclosed in the description and claims, where their detailed
: illustration is not essential for a proper understanding of the
: invention, should be illustrated in the drawing in the form of a
: graphical drawing symbol or a labeled representation (e.g., a labeled
: rectangular box). In addition, tables and sequence listings that are
: included in the specification are, except for applications filed under
: 35 U.S.C. 371, not permitted to be included in the drawings.
:
: (c)
: Where the drawings in a nonprovisional application do not comply with
: the requirements of paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, the examiner
: shall require such additional illustration within a time period of not
: less than two months from the date of the sending of a notice thereof.
: Such corrections are subject to the requirements of § 1.81(d).
:
: 37 CFR 1.81 (d)
: Drawings submitted after the filing date of the application may not be
: used to overcome any insufficiency of the specification due to lack of
: an enabling disclosure or otherwise inadequate disclosure therein, or to
: supplement the original disclosure thereof for the purpose of
: interpretation of the scope of any claim.
:
:
: 除非說明書說地夠清楚了,要不然要補充圖式是很困難的
:
: 而1.83(a)規定了想寫進claim的發明(能用圖表示的)都要畫成圖
:
--
樂創意
飆創新
玩專利
超過癮
--
Tags:
專利
All Comments
By Yedda
at 2014-05-03T21:43
at 2014-05-03T21:43
By Vanessa
at 2014-05-06T17:15
at 2014-05-06T17:15
By Steve
at 2014-05-07T14:15
at 2014-05-07T14:15
Related Posts
美國專利Claim寫法的要求
By Odelette
at 2014-04-29T21:42
at 2014-04-29T21:42
專利審查基準有實體書可購買嗎?
By Ingrid
at 2014-04-28T18:21
at 2014-04-28T18:21
畫圖件價格?
By Andrew
at 2014-04-27T21:20
at 2014-04-27T21:20
請推薦不錯的專利事務所(天線類)
By Emily
at 2014-04-26T19:32
at 2014-04-26T19:32
鴻海售通訊專利給Google
By Kyle
at 2014-04-26T06:31
at 2014-04-26T06:31