美國OA之答辯? - 專利

By Connor
at 2009-04-09T22:00
at 2009-04-09T22:00
Table of Contents
初來這個版 看到各位大大的豐富知識 真的很佩服
小弟有幾個問題想請各位大大指導一下
看過某間法律事務所的美國OA答辯內容
審查委員是以103(a)為由核駁,而且引了兩個引證案內容
而這間法律事務所的內容則是將該申請案的 claim 複製上去,
接著則寫
The teachings of the citations fail to teach or suggest the present invention.
Therefore, the present invention is patentable.
姑且不論兩個引證案是否真的不是很適當的引證案
但答辯內容僅寫這樣就要克服103(a)會不會很草率?
至少我覺得為何都沒陳述彼此之不同就想克服103(a) 真的是太異想天開了
而且這樣的response 還是出自著名法律事務所會不會太扯了?
而客戶的權益不就被白白給玩掉了
請各位大大指導一下囉 感恩先
--
Tags:
專利
All Comments

By Eartha
at 2009-04-10T17:37
at 2009-04-10T17:37

By Eartha
at 2009-04-14T10:06
at 2009-04-14T10:06

By Ethan
at 2009-04-15T00:55
at 2009-04-15T00:55

By Bethany
at 2009-04-18T23:05
at 2009-04-18T23:05

By Belly
at 2009-04-19T04:03
at 2009-04-19T04:03

By Queena
at 2009-04-22T19:54
at 2009-04-22T19:54

By Olivia
at 2009-04-25T03:19
at 2009-04-25T03:19

By Hamiltion
at 2009-04-27T13:56
at 2009-04-27T13:56

By Audriana
at 2009-04-30T08:25
at 2009-04-30T08:25

By Carol
at 2009-05-04T14:05
at 2009-05-04T14:05

By Isabella
at 2009-05-08T19:14
at 2009-05-08T19:14

By Zora
at 2009-05-11T14:13
at 2009-05-11T14:13

By Selena
at 2009-05-12T00:55
at 2009-05-12T00:55

By John
at 2009-05-14T15:24
at 2009-05-14T15:24

By Thomas
at 2009-05-17T23:41
at 2009-05-17T23:41

By Tristan Cohan
at 2009-05-20T10:27
at 2009-05-20T10:27

By Isla
at 2009-05-22T23:44
at 2009-05-22T23:44

By Elvira
at 2009-05-25T21:36
at 2009-05-25T21:36

By Robert
at 2009-05-27T07:57
at 2009-05-27T07:57

By Sandy
at 2009-06-01T02:41
at 2009-06-01T02:41

By Audriana
at 2009-06-05T12:30
at 2009-06-05T12:30

By Damian
at 2009-06-05T20:07
at 2009-06-05T20:07

By Jessica
at 2009-06-09T05:42
at 2009-06-09T05:42

By Mia
at 2009-06-10T11:09
at 2009-06-10T11:09

By Donna
at 2009-06-10T12:28
at 2009-06-10T12:28

By Megan
at 2009-06-15T02:25
at 2009-06-15T02:25

By Jessica
at 2009-06-15T15:55
at 2009-06-15T15:55

By Oliver
at 2009-06-17T01:17
at 2009-06-17T01:17

By Hardy
at 2009-06-19T03:44
at 2009-06-19T03:44

By Lily
at 2009-06-19T21:05
at 2009-06-19T21:05

By Freda
at 2009-06-22T02:10
at 2009-06-22T02:10

By Kyle
at 2009-06-24T06:00
at 2009-06-24T06:00

By Lily
at 2009-06-27T21:59
at 2009-06-27T21:59

By Elvira
at 2009-07-01T10:46
at 2009-07-01T10:46

By Elvira
at 2009-07-02T09:27
at 2009-07-02T09:27

By Catherine
at 2009-07-06T02:47
at 2009-07-06T02:47

By Frederic
at 2009-07-09T08:40
at 2009-07-09T08:40

By Edward Lewis
at 2009-07-09T20:26
at 2009-07-09T20:26

By Rachel
at 2009-07-13T15:32
at 2009-07-13T15:32

By Kama
at 2009-07-18T14:19
at 2009-07-18T14:19

By Daniel
at 2009-07-20T16:44
at 2009-07-20T16:44

By George
at 2009-07-21T19:48
at 2009-07-21T19:48

By Regina
at 2009-07-26T03:49
at 2009-07-26T03:49

By Zanna
at 2009-07-27T10:27
at 2009-07-27T10:27

By Rebecca
at 2009-07-31T07:10
at 2009-07-31T07:10

By Blanche
at 2009-08-02T09:32
at 2009-08-02T09:32
Related Posts
請問貝斯特國際智權股份有限公司面試

By Poppy
at 2009-04-08T20:30
at 2009-04-08T20:30
請問將群智權事務所面試!!!

By Audriana
at 2009-04-08T14:08
at 2009-04-08T14:08
專利核駁原因會公告嗎?

By Hamiltion
at 2009-04-07T23:58
at 2009-04-07T23:58
醫療行為及手術方法之專利相關問題

By Thomas
at 2009-04-07T21:24
at 2009-04-07T21:24
用USPTO的Public PAIR找Reexamination的案例

By Irma
at 2009-04-07T17:39
at 2009-04-07T17:39