有關美國新法35 USC 102(b)(2)(c) - 專利

Wallis avatar
By Wallis
at 2018-04-12T01:12

Table of Contents

以下為了閱讀方便分成102(a)(1)和102(a)(2)

(a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed
publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the
public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention;


(b) EXCEPTIONS.—

(1) DISCLOSURES MADE 1 YEAR OR LESS BEFORE THE EFFECTIVE FILING DATE OF THE
CLAIMED INVENTION.—A disclosure made 1 year or less before the effective
filing date of a claimed invention shall not be prior art to the claimed
invention under subsection (a)(1) if

(A) the disclosure was made by the inventor or joint inventor or by another
who obtained the subject matter disclosed directly or indirectly from the
inventor or a joint inventor; or

(B) the subject matter disclosed had, before such disclosure, been publicly
disclosed by the inventor or a joint inventor or another who obtained the
subject matter disclosed directly or indirectly from the inventor or a joint
inventor.

--

(a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section
151 , or in an application for patent published or deemed published under
section 122(b) , in which the patent or application, as the case may be,
names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing
date of the claimed invention.

(b) EXCEPTIONS.—

(2) DISCLOSURES APPEARING IN APPLICATIONS AND PATENTS.—A disclosure shall
not be prior art to a claimed invention under subsection (a)(2) if

(A) the subject matter disclosed was obtained directly or indirectly from the
inventor or a joint inventor;

(B) the subject matter disclosed had, before such subject matter was
effectively filed under subsection (a)(2), been publicly disclosed by the
inventor or a joint inventor or another who obtained the subject matter
disclosed directly or indirectly from the inventor or a joint inventor; or

(C) the subject matter disclosed and the claimed invention, not later than
the effective filing date of the claimed invention, were owned by the same
person or subject to an obligation of assignment to the same person.


※ 引述《PumpkinHead (PumpkinHead)》之銘言:
: 請問版上的各位大大
: 最近讀到美國新法35 USC 102(b)(2)(c) 新穎性喪失之例外
: 以下法條原文
: 102(b)(2)
: Exceptions.- DISCLOSURES APPEARING IN APPLICATIONS AND PATENTS- A disclosure
: shall not be prior art to a claimed invention under subsection (a)(2) if-
: (c) the subject matter disclosed and the claimed invention, not later than the
: effective filing date of the claimed invention, were owned by the the same
: person or subject to an obligation of assignment to the same person.
: 所以說根據這法條 一間公司所擁有的專利都不會變成該公司往後專利申請案的先前技術
: 了嗎 ??
: 一個專利菜鳥的疑問 希望大家不吝指教
: 謝謝~

如果不符合紅底的部分根本就逃不過102(a)(1),

如果你逃過102(a)(1),然後又符合102(a)(2)的exception,才可以不被視為prior art
、被用102打。

--
Tags: 專利

All Comments

Edith avatar
By Edith
at 2018-04-14T12:26
謝謝大大的回覆 那如果說我今天逃過了102(a)(1)
Connor avatar
By Connor
at 2018-04-17T12:13
102(a)(2)提到prior art是names another inventor
Lily avatar
By Lily
at 2018-04-17T18:22
所以會被102(a)(2)打的話 本案應該是用102(b)(1)(B)
Susan avatar
By Susan
at 2018-04-21T11:36
逃過的 那本案是否能再用102(b)(2)(B)逃過
Franklin avatar
By Franklin
at 2018-04-23T20:26
推C大正解

對於TRPG的專利權問題

Ida avatar
By Ida
at 2018-04-11T18:05
※ 引述《alfand (alf)》之銘言: : 先介紹一下TRPG : 是一種桌上遊戲類型 : 有許多不同的系統 ex.Dandamp;D CoC : 系統規範了遊戲進行的方式、世界觀、如何創立角色 : 玩家將扮演自己創造的角色在不同的劇本下遊玩 : 1.遊戲進行的方式算是專利嗎? : 2.角色的數值化方式 ...

對於TRPG的專利權問題

Mia avatar
By Mia
at 2018-04-11T11:58
最近接觸到TRPG感到有興趣 有一些問題想要請教 先介紹一下TRPG 是一種桌上遊戲類型 有許多不同的系統 ex.Dandamp;D CoC 系統規範了遊戲進行的方式、世界觀、如何創立角色 玩家將扮演自己創造的角色在不同的劇本下遊玩 1.遊戲進行的方式算是專利嗎? 2.角色的數值化方式算是專利嗎? ...

PlayNitride Inc.徵IH專利工程師

Kristin avatar
By Kristin
at 2018-04-11T08:44
※ [本文轉錄自 Tech_Job 看板 #1QpLeUA0 ] 作者: nazomi (I need a doctor.) 看板: Tech_Job 標題: [徵才] PlayNitride Inc.徵IH專利工程師 時間: Wed Apr 11 08:43:07 2018 【公司名稱】 PlayN ...

聖島是否會通知有無通過筆試?

Iris avatar
By Iris
at 2018-03-31T18:58
大家好,上星期去聖島參加專利工程師一職的筆試, 看網友心得文,似乎大約1~2星期後會通知是否可以參加第二階段的面試。 想請問大家的是,如果筆試沒通過的話,聖島會通知應徵者嗎? 還是就無聲卡一張呢?謝謝大家。 - ...

LED燈驅動元件美國ITC專利訴訟,Ultravis

Ethan avatar
By Ethan
at 2018-03-30T15:32
[情報]LED燈驅動元件美國ITC專利訴訟,Ultravision控告中國11家業者 https://bit.ly/2GCkD2C [內容] 2018年3月27日,美國Ultravision Technologies公司向美國國際貿易委員會(ITC)提出 337調查,指控艾比森、奧拓電子等11家中國企業, ...