審查委員為什麼這麼用法條? - 專利
By Ula
at 2005-09-16T22:39
at 2005-09-16T22:39
Table of Contents
(假設) 當審查委員找到前案並且此前案符合 102(a) 也符合 102(b)
那麼審查委員會用哪一條呢?
另一個百思不得其解的實例:
A案:US filing date XX/XX/XX , priority date: 2003/10/03
引證案甲:US6521846 B1, Filing date: 2002/01/07
引證案乙:US6486543 B1, Filing date: 2001/02/16
審查委員用 引(甲)及102(e) 駁A案某獨立項。又用 引(乙)及102(b)駁A另一獨立項。
Why? @@a
--
Tags:
專利
All Comments
By Ingrid
at 2005-09-18T17:41
at 2005-09-18T17:41
By Genevieve
at 2005-09-21T04:51
at 2005-09-21T04:51
Related Posts
請問在智慧財產局擔任專利審查需要通過 …
By Zanna
at 2005-09-13T15:40
at 2005-09-13T15:40
網路方法專利和專利屬地主義的問題
By Leila
at 2005-09-13T00:41
at 2005-09-13T00:41
Re: 專利討論區不可避免的宿命~
By Tristan Cohan
at 2005-09-13T00:11
at 2005-09-13T00:11
請問在智慧財產局擔任專利審查需要通過 …
By Anthony
at 2005-09-13T00:02
at 2005-09-13T00:02
請問在智慧財產局擔任專利審查需要通過高考嗎
By Andrew
at 2005-09-12T22:45
at 2005-09-12T22:45