大陸有這種說法嗎????? - 專利
By Olive
at 2014-02-06T21:20
at 2014-02-06T21:20
Table of Contents
最近剛從某大陸代理人聽到這樣的說法.....
==============================================================================
"關於權利要求中的"一",實質上是英文"a",非為"one",但是,在大陸判斷"一"時,
有可能會判斷為數量詞如:一個等,那麼在權利要求中就只能保護"一個",而不保護二個
、三個或多個,故將會使權利要求保護範圍縮小,因此,我們會根據理解而將"一"字刪除
,以避免範圍較小(我們在做英文案時均是如此)。"
如果"一"是"one"的詞義,則我們將不刪除"一"字,這時只保護一個、一件、一條等數量。
也就是說,凡是"a"的"一",我們將刪除之,凡是"one"的"一"我們將不刪除之,而刪除"一"字
的保護範圍將擴寬,而不刪除"一"字,則有可能僅保護數量為"一個"的範圍。
=============================================================================
這真是完全顛覆了我對 claim interpretation 的理解......
寫一 "就只能保護一個"??? 那我要開放式語法幹嘛???
廢掉算了 是吧.... 冏興.....................
更讓我吶悶的是.... "a" 和 "one" 不都翻成 一個, 一件, 一條 etc.
那你要怎麼去區分 它原來的意義是指哪個字 and 要不要 該不該刪.....
在解讀 Claim 時 要怎麼知道他是有可能限縮的 "a" 而不是 "one"
再加上這篇回覆 還有自打嘴巴的地方.... 第一段說 "a" 會被限縮
第二段又說 "one" 也會被限縮....(這是在鬼打牆嗎?????)
不過人家是大陸代理人阿.........(嘩~~~~大陸代理人耶~~~~~~)
所以我只好備上 三牲素果 沐浴更衣 到板上來拜神摟........
請問板上的大大們 有聽過對岸有這麼別出心裁的 Claim 解讀方式????
或者有知道比較 solid 的範例或判例嗎????
我怕我好奇的晚上睡不好啊.....(叩首...........)
--
Tags:
專利
All Comments
By Agnes
at 2014-02-09T03:40
at 2014-02-09T03:40
By Mary
at 2014-02-10T22:46
at 2014-02-10T22:46
By William
at 2014-02-11T14:40
at 2014-02-11T14:40
By Dora
at 2014-02-12T01:13
at 2014-02-12T01:13
By John
at 2014-02-12T10:54
at 2014-02-12T10:54
By Robert
at 2014-02-15T04:07
at 2014-02-15T04:07
By Caitlin
at 2014-02-15T08:42
at 2014-02-15T08:42
By Dorothy
at 2014-02-16T11:06
at 2014-02-16T11:06
By Kyle
at 2014-02-17T00:11
at 2014-02-17T00:11
By Puput
at 2014-02-19T07:04
at 2014-02-19T07:04
By Lucy
at 2014-02-19T17:52
at 2014-02-19T17:52
By Connor
at 2014-02-21T19:27
at 2014-02-21T19:27
By Charlotte
at 2014-02-23T08:08
at 2014-02-23T08:08
By Delia
at 2014-02-28T02:02
at 2014-02-28T02:02
By Ingrid
at 2014-03-04T01:26
at 2014-03-04T01:26
By Zenobia
at 2014-03-07T20:37
at 2014-03-07T20:37
By Christine
at 2014-03-11T05:05
at 2014-03-11T05:05
By Delia
at 2014-03-15T12:07
at 2014-03-15T12:07
By Una
at 2014-03-19T16:03
at 2014-03-19T16:03
By Hamiltion
at 2014-03-20T10:07
at 2014-03-20T10:07
By Ingrid
at 2014-03-22T11:20
at 2014-03-22T11:20
By Charlie
at 2014-03-25T15:18
at 2014-03-25T15:18
By Harry
at 2014-03-30T14:48
at 2014-03-30T14:48
By Olga
at 2014-04-01T19:06
at 2014-04-01T19:06
By Callum
at 2014-04-06T11:18
at 2014-04-06T11:18
By Frederic
at 2014-04-11T04:19
at 2014-04-11T04:19
By Susan
at 2014-04-15T23:39
at 2014-04-15T23:39
By Elizabeth
at 2014-04-20T00:48
at 2014-04-20T00:48
By Andy
at 2014-04-24T02:00
at 2014-04-24T02:00
By Belly
at 2014-04-27T06:38
at 2014-04-27T06:38
By Christine
at 2014-04-29T03:01
at 2014-04-29T03:01
By Daniel
at 2014-05-03T10:50
at 2014-05-03T10:50
By Kumar
at 2014-05-08T02:53
at 2014-05-08T02:53
By Hedwig
at 2014-05-12T04:55
at 2014-05-12T04:55
By Bennie
at 2014-05-16T15:43
at 2014-05-16T15:43
By Andy
at 2014-05-16T18:04
at 2014-05-16T18:04
By Joe
at 2014-05-16T20:40
at 2014-05-16T20:40
By Heather
at 2014-05-19T13:06
at 2014-05-19T13:06
By Ursula
at 2014-05-22T19:57
at 2014-05-22T19:57
By Callum
at 2014-05-27T19:08
at 2014-05-27T19:08
By Joseph
at 2014-05-28T03:14
at 2014-05-28T03:14
By Catherine
at 2014-05-28T11:42
at 2014-05-28T11:42
By Mary
at 2014-05-31T17:59
at 2014-05-31T17:59
Related Posts
醫療行為及手術方法之專利的實用
By Rae
at 2014-02-03T22:59
at 2014-02-03T22:59
關於建築土木專利
By Andy
at 2014-02-03T20:01
at 2014-02-03T20:01
連邦徵的Marketing Specialist
By Queena
at 2014-02-02T21:03
at 2014-02-02T21:03
預算?收費?
By Yedda
at 2014-02-02T09:02
at 2014-02-02T09:02
這樣子的改寫,仍然算原著作權?
By Faithe
at 2014-02-01T12:23
at 2014-02-01T12:23