侵權鑑定 - 專利
By Tracy
at 2014-06-24T16:25
at 2014-06-24T16:25
Table of Contents
現行專利侵害鑑定基準中
http://www.tipo.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=285950&ctNode=6727&mp=1
壹、發明（或新型）專利侵害之鑑定原則 第二章 鑑定流程
二、比對解釋後之申請專利範圍與待鑑定對象包括下列步驟：
(一)解析申請專利範圍之技術特徵
(二)解析待鑑定對象之技術內容
(三)基於全要件原則，判斷待鑑定對象是否符合「文義讀取」
(四)基於全要件原則，判斷待鑑定對象是否適用「均等論」
若是，則判斷是否有「禁反言」或「先前技術阻卻」
如前面討論個老半天的文章，
問題是：
由上文可見，禁反言的基礎是以 文義讀取、均等論均成立為前題，但若核准的請求項
本身在答辯中有擴長而包含到己被放棄的部份時 ，其並無禁反言之適用。
所以遇到這狀態，侵權方又剛落入原被放棄的部份時，應用什麼名目主張不落入專利
範圍？是逆均等嗎？還是...?
以上，請先進們不吝指教
--
http://www.tipo.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=285950&ctNode=6727&mp=1
壹、發明（或新型）專利侵害之鑑定原則 第二章 鑑定流程
二、比對解釋後之申請專利範圍與待鑑定對象包括下列步驟：
(一)解析申請專利範圍之技術特徵
(二)解析待鑑定對象之技術內容
(三)基於全要件原則，判斷待鑑定對象是否符合「文義讀取」
(四)基於全要件原則，判斷待鑑定對象是否適用「均等論」
若是，則判斷是否有「禁反言」或「先前技術阻卻」
如前面討論個老半天的文章，
問題是：
由上文可見，禁反言的基礎是以 文義讀取、均等論均成立為前題，但若核准的請求項
本身在答辯中有擴長而包含到己被放棄的部份時 ，其並無禁反言之適用。
所以遇到這狀態，侵權方又剛落入原被放棄的部份時，應用什麼名目主張不落入專利
範圍？是逆均等嗎？還是...?
以上，請先進們不吝指教
--
Tags:
專利
All Comments
By Elma
at 2014-06-25T10:49
at 2014-06-25T10:49
By Joe
at 2014-06-27T18:57
at 2014-06-27T18:57
By Emma
at 2014-06-28T07:09
at 2014-06-28T07:09
By Edwina
at 2014-07-01T09:16
at 2014-07-01T09:16
By Sandy
at 2014-07-01T15:04
at 2014-07-01T15:04
By Christine
at 2014-07-04T07:12
at 2014-07-04T07:12
By Daph Bay
at 2014-07-05T03:08
at 2014-07-05T03:08
By Joseph
at 2014-07-07T09:01
at 2014-07-07T09:01
By Regina
at 2014-07-09T05:06
at 2014-07-09T05:06
By Una
at 2014-07-10T00:23
at 2014-07-10T00:23
By Mary
at 2014-07-14T13:00
at 2014-07-14T13:00
By Elizabeth
at 2014-07-18T20:20
at 2014-07-18T20:20
By Necoo
at 2014-07-20T20:06
at 2014-07-20T20:06
By Jack
at 2014-07-24T21:37
at 2014-07-24T21:37
By Hardy
at 2014-07-26T02:26
at 2014-07-26T02:26
By Audriana
at 2014-07-29T01:08
at 2014-07-29T01:08
By James
at 2014-07-30T00:55
at 2014-07-30T00:55
By Carolina Franco
at 2014-08-03T11:28
at 2014-08-03T11:28
By Sarah
at 2014-08-04T15:41
at 2014-08-04T15:41
By Hedwig
at 2014-08-05T05:37
at 2014-08-05T05:37
By Leila
at 2014-08-09T11:05
at 2014-08-09T11:05
By Liam
at 2014-08-12T06:19
at 2014-08-12T06:19
By Carol
at 2014-08-15T02:33
at 2014-08-15T02:33
By Oscar
at 2014-08-19T19:55
at 2014-08-19T19:55
By Kelly
at 2014-08-23T17:00
at 2014-08-23T17:00
By Rachel
at 2014-08-26T11:14
at 2014-08-26T11:14
By Callum
at 2014-08-30T16:32
at 2014-08-30T16:32
By Robert
at 2014-09-01T09:34
at 2014-09-01T09:34
By Jessica
at 2014-09-05T08:15
at 2014-09-05T08:15
By Rae
at 2014-09-09T22:43
at 2014-09-09T22:43
By Rae
at 2014-09-11T18:10
at 2014-09-11T18:10
By William
at 2014-09-16T15:54
at 2014-09-16T15:54
By Rae
at 2014-09-17T11:01
at 2014-09-17T11:01
By Irma
at 2014-09-19T14:33
at 2014-09-19T14:33
By Bennie
at 2014-09-23T01:08
at 2014-09-23T01:08
By Olive
at 2014-09-26T12:43
at 2014-09-26T12:43
By Catherine
at 2014-09-29T07:09
at 2014-09-29T07:09
By Noah
at 2014-10-03T07:29
at 2014-10-03T07:29
By Skylar Davis
at 2014-10-06T15:44
at 2014-10-06T15:44
By Anonymous
at 2014-10-06T23:41
at 2014-10-06T23:41
By Hedda
at 2014-10-07T01:38
at 2014-10-07T01:38
By Isla
at 2014-10-11T01:38
at 2014-10-11T01:38
By Skylar DavisLinda
at 2014-10-13T06:11
at 2014-10-13T06:11
By Yuri
at 2014-10-14T13:56
at 2014-10-14T13:56
By Lucy
at 2014-10-16T14:19
at 2014-10-16T14:19
By Joseph
at 2014-10-17T07:38
at 2014-10-17T07:38
Related Posts
石墨烯專利地圖曝光 中韓混戰蘋果出局!
By Irma
at 2014-06-24T10:45
at 2014-06-24T10:45
大陸專利訴訟 誰最牛逼？
By Anthony
at 2014-06-23T17:48
at 2014-06-23T17:48
請教高雄有推薦的醫材類專利所嗎?
By Faithe
at 2014-06-20T23:35
at 2014-06-20T23:35
U.S.C. 102問題
By Candice
at 2014-06-20T15:54
at 2014-06-20T15:54
請問申請台灣專利一定要有英文摘要嗎?
By Yuri
at 2014-06-19T16:50
at 2014-06-19T16:50