一個核駁 - 專利
By Blanche
at 2012-02-20T23:18
at 2012-02-20T23:18
Table of Contents
有一個OA 引證案 是 xx裝置包括 A+B+C
但是本發明案是 xx裝置包括 A+B
(由此可見 本發明寫的時後沒看過引證案 所以沒有特別迴避)
本發明案 說明書沒有提到關於C的任何東西
這樣的引證案 還有辦法argue嗎?
想法1: 不能
因為說明書沒有寫不包括C 所以無法寫入claim中
想法2: 可以
在claim中寫 一種不包括C的 XX裝置
並且說明書中的實施例也的確沒包括C
請教一下 哪種說法是對的?
或者有別的打法?
--
Tags:
專利
All Comments
By Lauren
at 2012-02-21T11:33
at 2012-02-21T11:33
By Dinah
at 2012-02-22T07:13
at 2012-02-22T07:13
By Adele
at 2012-02-23T03:10
at 2012-02-23T03:10
By Yuri
at 2012-02-27T02:46
at 2012-02-27T02:46
By Regina
at 2012-03-02T03:11
at 2012-03-02T03:11
By Daph Bay
at 2012-03-05T03:14
at 2012-03-05T03:14
By Yuri
at 2012-03-08T14:58
at 2012-03-08T14:58
By Joseph
at 2012-03-09T08:23
at 2012-03-09T08:23
By Bethany
at 2012-03-11T17:41
at 2012-03-11T17:41
By Delia
at 2012-03-16T09:02
at 2012-03-16T09:02
By Jacky
at 2012-03-18T06:41
at 2012-03-18T06:41
By Margaret
at 2012-03-21T17:17
at 2012-03-21T17:17
By Sandy
at 2012-03-25T18:37
at 2012-03-25T18:37
By Olive
at 2012-03-26T05:11
at 2012-03-26T05:11
Related Posts
請問電腦軟體的專利
By Ula
at 2012-02-20T23:00
at 2012-02-20T23:00
台中 專利工程師 新人起薪?
By Leila
at 2012-02-20T11:39
at 2012-02-20T11:39
考試院專技考試扼殺知識經濟與國家競爭力
By Daniel
at 2012-02-17T23:54
at 2012-02-17T23:54
請問專利審查的用書
By Jake
at 2012-02-17T14:32
at 2012-02-17T14:32
歐盟發明專利問題
By Anthony
at 2012-02-17T11:53
at 2012-02-17T11:53