USPTO新法暫停實施 - 專利

Hardy avatar
By Hardy
at 2007-11-01T10:51

Table of Contents

NOTICE REGARDING CLAIMS AND CONTINUATIONS RULES
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) published a final rule
notice in the Federal Register to revise the rules of practice in patent
cases relating to continuing applications and requests for continued
examination practices, and for the examination of claims in patent
applications. See Changes to Practice for Continued Examination Filings,
Patent Applications Containing Patentably Indistinct Claims, and Examination
of Claims in Patent Applications, 72 Fed. Reg. 46716 (Aug. 21, 2007) (Claims
and Continuations Final Rule). The final rule notice published in the Federal
Register indicates that the effective date for the changes to the rules of
practice in the Claims and Continuations Final Rule is November 1, 2007.

On October 31, 2007, the United States District Court for the Eastern
District Court of Virginia, however, issued a Preliminary Injunction
enjoining the USPTO from implementing the changes in the Claims and
Continuations Final Rule. Therefore, the changes to the rules of practice in
the Claims and Continuations Final Rule will not go into effect on November
1, 2007.

USPTO employees are to continue processing and examining patent applications
under the rules and procedures in effect on October 31, 2007, until further
notice.

This Web site will be updated and USPTO employees will be notified with
further information as it becomes available.

Inquiries regarding this notice should be directed to the appropriate TC
representative.


http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/GSK_20PI_20Order.pdf
--
恩...不太清楚發preliminary injunction的原因

不知道有沒有人可以提供一下

總而言之是個好消息...

--
Tags: 專利

All Comments

Jack avatar
By Jack
at 2007-11-03T21:07
本日最紅消息
Puput avatar
By Puput
at 2007-11-04T12:33
也很好奇為什麼州法院的的禁制令可以約束USPTO
Eartha avatar
By Eartha
at 2007-11-06T03:40
interesting!
Leila avatar
By Leila
at 2007-11-08T03:13
州法院..嗎 可能uspto總部或主機剛好在那州 屬地給他判?
Eartha avatar
By Eartha
at 2007-11-12T12:51
這間是Federal Ct.理由是PTO逾越權限(有點類似台灣行政
Regina avatar
By Regina
at 2007-11-13T03:25
法的法律保留原則) 對firm這可能是好消息 但對常被美韓
Kristin avatar
By Kristin
at 2007-11-17T11:36
大廠以CA等子孫案控告侵權的台灣inhouse卻可能是壞消息
Blanche avatar
By Blanche
at 2007-11-21T06:06
聽同事說USPTO總部也在Virginia 所以他可以發injunction
Rae avatar
By Rae
at 2007-11-23T02:03
不過如果federal court覺得不合理的話 也許還會翻案
Gilbert avatar
By Gilbert
at 2007-11-25T12:31
這間是聯邦地院,而且是有名的Rocket Docket,審一個訴訟
Skylar DavisLinda avatar
By Skylar DavisLinda
at 2007-11-30T00:09
比USPTO審一件申請案還快
James avatar
By James
at 2007-12-04T01:13
這不是聯邦法院...這個Injunction最上面很明顯寫著
THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA....
Oscar avatar
By Oscar
at 2007-12-06T09:28
這是地院....這件案子雙方都很堅持而且後台都很硬..
最後打到SUPREME COURT的機會很大....
Daniel avatar
By Daniel
at 2007-12-10T20:48
更正..是最上面寫著DISTRICT COURT..所以可知是地院..
Gary avatar
By Gary
at 2007-12-12T01:53
DISTRICT COURT可以是州體系的地院,也可以是聯邦法院體系
Suhail Hany avatar
By Suhail Hany
at 2007-12-15T12:27
的下級法院/地院,但是只有聯邦體系地院才會稱呼為
Ivy avatar
By Ivy
at 2007-12-17T04:25
the "United States" District Court for .....
THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA是眾多聯邦地院中審理
Victoria avatar
By Victoria
at 2007-12-21T01:02
專利速最快的,所以被稱為Rocket Docket

剛退伍對園區工程師的一些問題

Noah avatar
By Noah
at 2007-10-30T21:38
※ [本文轉錄自 Tech_Job 看板] 作者: chules (期待第三個奇蹟降臨~) 看板: Tech_Job 標題: [請益] 剛退伍對園區工程師的一些問題 時間: Tue Oct 30 21:37:48 2007 各位板上也許是將來小弟的前輩們大家好 小弟剛退伍 最近開始找工作 本身的學歷是私 ...

兩家事務所的決擇(借用標題)

Skylar Davis avatar
By Skylar Davis
at 2007-10-30T02:48
各位先進大家好 我是今年畢業的社會新鮮人 國立三類大學學士碩士 只聽過專利相關講座 沒有實際接觸過 之前一直以為生物醫藥case較少 沒有想到有機會進入大型或是成立較久的事務所 目前手邊有永和x美 以及 博愛路x國專利的offer 前者我應徵的職務不是專利工程師 是專利工程研究人員(屬法務部門) ...

兩家事務所的決擇

Necoo avatar
By Necoo
at 2007-10-29T13:22
再請問一下 目前認為第一家比較好的意見比較多 我也真的很猶豫了 我的想法是 如果先去第二家做個一年 覺得不好 再出來到別家重新學起 (也許就不好意思去第一家了) 這樣子如何呢? 也許 ...

最近接觸到一件案子

Jack avatar
By Jack
at 2007-10-28T15:07
有誤會 看原來的推文 少按一次 我是說你前面兩個在亂 一個說電子流和電流一樣 沒看到你的推文 這是我的疏忽 至於你說的 首先這個案子有保密的義務 不能說得很明白 不過筆不筆誤 不是誰說了算 一來一回可是筆大生意 電流是可以不 ...

最近接觸到一件案子

Elvira avatar
By Elvira
at 2007-10-27T09:24
懶得看推文和筆戰了 我是學了智財才入IPO 後來發覺怪怪的離開 發覺很多事並不如直覺 更重要的是無知 你說的事務所 看來像李先生的理X 這家事務所的這樣做的原因 我不想和你分享 這年頭知識是有價值的 至少對某些人來說 至於事務所的也沒啥了不起 寫中文的 電流方向都會寫錯 原來的IHPE IFPE ...