ITC所發佈之通知的解讀。 - 專利

By Andy
at 2019-07-26T16:01
at 2019-07-26T16:01
Table of Contents
各位好:
https://enpan.blogspot.com/2017/07/irobot.html
https://enpan.blogspot.com/2018/03/matsutekv-irobot.html
我在follow以上幾篇有關irobot專利的訴訟消息時,查了一下資料,從google上看到以下
連結。它是ITC在09/18/2018時所發佈的通知。
https://reurl.cc/nalve
我讀了很久,看了不太懂,程度不夠有點吃力。因此,想請教。
finding a violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended with
respect to U.S.Patent Nos. 8,600,553 and 9,038,233 and no violation with
respect to U.S. Patent Nos. 6,809,490 and 8,474,090.
上面是指,ITC的決定認為:
針對U.S.Patent Nos. 8,600,553 and 9,038,233 有侵權。
針對U.S. Patent Nos. 6,809,490 and 8,474,090 沒有侵權。
這樣的想法,是對的嗎?
--
Tags:
專利
All Comments

By Cara
at 2019-07-26T23:26
at 2019-07-26T23:26
Related Posts
台灣專利師相關試題

By Caroline
at 2019-07-22T19:08
at 2019-07-22T19:08
高通反壟斷敗訴案可能敗部復活?美司法

By Charlotte
at 2019-07-22T09:27
at 2019-07-22T09:27
高通掠奪性定價違法 歐盟第二次開罰2.42

By Caroline
at 2019-07-19T14:17
at 2019-07-19T14:17
金研院無形資產評價認證班-揪團報

By Erin
at 2019-07-15T17:34
at 2019-07-15T17:34
Unified Patents:PATROLL平台獎勵將NPEs

By Bethany
at 2019-07-10T09:23
at 2019-07-10T09:23