FED:政策比想像寬鬆,考慮擴大QE3 - 投資

By Audriana
at 2012-11-09T13:47
at 2012-11-09T13:47
Table of Contents
Ref. http://tinyurl.com/bzs7clc
快買黃金?FED:政策比想像寬鬆,考慮擴大QE3
MoneyDJ 財經知識庫 2012/11/09 12:32
精實新聞 2012-11-09 12:31:49 記者 郭妍希 報導
歐巴馬(Barack Obama)當選總統讓市場預期聯準會(FED)可能會繼續推出更多量化寬
鬆貨幣政策(QE),而FED官員最近的說法更証實了市場的猜測。
外電報導,聖路易斯聯邦準備銀行總裁James Bullard 8日在華盛頓大學奧林商學院
(Olin Business School)發表演說時表示,美國貨幣政策可能比外界想像的還要寬鬆許
多。他還表示,聯準會(FED)可能會被迫在今(2012)年底終止「扭曲操作(Operation
Twist)」公債買賣活動(買進長債、出脫短債),因為央行握有的短天期公債已經所剩
無幾,而FED也正在考慮是否要擴大第三回合量化寬鬆貨幣政策(QE3)的規模。Bullard
普遍被市場視為鷹派,他在2013年聯邦公開市場操作委員會(FOMC)擁有投票權。
Bullard說,紐西蘭央行資深顧問Leo Krippner的研究顯示,FED的量化寬鬆貨幣政策已使
得美國短期利率(即所謂的「影子利率(shadow rate)」)來到-5%的水位,較泰勒法則
(Taylor rule,以綜合所得、通膨水位衡量資金利率是否合適的指標)建議的利率還要
低300多個基點。
Bullard同時表示,在被迫終止扭曲操作之後,他不確定FED會端出什麼方案作為替換。此
外,雖然FED的確考慮擴大QE3規模,但他仍不願對未來的做法驟下定論。Bullard說,現
在還無法看出FED新一輪的不動產抵押貸款證券(Mortgage Backed Securities;MBS)收
購計畫、將趨近於零的聯邦基金利率維持到至少2015年年中的宣示會有什麼樣的影響。
雖然最近美國的經濟數據開始有所改善,但這仍未讓擁護FED推出貨幣刺激政策的人士改
觀,他們依舊認為失業率還是太高,央行在通膨偏低的環境下仍有足夠空間可以行動。
舊金山聯邦準備銀行總裁John Williams 11月5日在結束加州大學的演說後對記者表示,
預期QE3的規模很可能會超過6,000億美元,高於第二輪的債券購買規模,主因FED在就業
市況改善之前,將會持續不斷購買資產。他說,以就業市場目前的狀態以及復甦的速度來
看,預期FED明(2013)年很可能會繼續買進資產,直到工作機會持續增加、失業率穩定
下滑為止。
Williams並指出,最新數據顯示,QE對刺激經濟成長仍有效益,且並未導致通膨上升。他
並強調,目前完全沒有看到通膨增溫的跡象,也並未誘使投資人承擔過多風險。
商品投資大師羅傑斯(Jim Rogers)11月7日在接受CNBC專訪時表示,隨著歐巴馬連任總
統,投資人應該要為通膨以及更多量化寬鬆貨幣政策(QE)預作準備。他並痛批,歐巴馬
與羅姆尼都很「邪惡」,兩個人都不值得他去投票。
羅傑斯說,歐巴馬勝選的話,通膨將會繼續增溫,央行也會印出更多鈔票,而債務、花費
也會愈來愈多,而他打算出售美國公債並買進黃金等貴金屬。
有「末日博士」之稱的投資大師麥嘉華(Marc Faber)11月7日在接受彭博社電是專訪時
表示,歐巴馬根本不在乎讓美國債台高築,而在柏南克(Ben S. Bernanke)刻意壓低利
率的推波助瀾下,債務將會永無止境地上升。
*編者按:本文僅供參考之用,並不構成要約、招攬或邀請、誘使、任何不論種類或形式
之申述或訂立任何建議及推薦,讀者務請運用個人獨立思考能力,自行作出投資決定,如
因相關建議招致損失,概與《精實財經媒體》、編者及作者無涉。
--
快買黃金?FED:政策比想像寬鬆,考慮擴大QE3
MoneyDJ 財經知識庫 2012/11/09 12:32
精實新聞 2012-11-09 12:31:49 記者 郭妍希 報導
歐巴馬(Barack Obama)當選總統讓市場預期聯準會(FED)可能會繼續推出更多量化寬
鬆貨幣政策(QE),而FED官員最近的說法更証實了市場的猜測。
外電報導,聖路易斯聯邦準備銀行總裁James Bullard 8日在華盛頓大學奧林商學院
(Olin Business School)發表演說時表示,美國貨幣政策可能比外界想像的還要寬鬆許
多。他還表示,聯準會(FED)可能會被迫在今(2012)年底終止「扭曲操作(Operation
Twist)」公債買賣活動(買進長債、出脫短債),因為央行握有的短天期公債已經所剩
無幾,而FED也正在考慮是否要擴大第三回合量化寬鬆貨幣政策(QE3)的規模。Bullard
普遍被市場視為鷹派,他在2013年聯邦公開市場操作委員會(FOMC)擁有投票權。
Bullard說,紐西蘭央行資深顧問Leo Krippner的研究顯示,FED的量化寬鬆貨幣政策已使
得美國短期利率(即所謂的「影子利率(shadow rate)」)來到-5%的水位,較泰勒法則
(Taylor rule,以綜合所得、通膨水位衡量資金利率是否合適的指標)建議的利率還要
低300多個基點。
Bullard同時表示,在被迫終止扭曲操作之後,他不確定FED會端出什麼方案作為替換。此
外,雖然FED的確考慮擴大QE3規模,但他仍不願對未來的做法驟下定論。Bullard說,現
在還無法看出FED新一輪的不動產抵押貸款證券(Mortgage Backed Securities;MBS)收
購計畫、將趨近於零的聯邦基金利率維持到至少2015年年中的宣示會有什麼樣的影響。
雖然最近美國的經濟數據開始有所改善,但這仍未讓擁護FED推出貨幣刺激政策的人士改
觀,他們依舊認為失業率還是太高,央行在通膨偏低的環境下仍有足夠空間可以行動。
舊金山聯邦準備銀行總裁John Williams 11月5日在結束加州大學的演說後對記者表示,
預期QE3的規模很可能會超過6,000億美元,高於第二輪的債券購買規模,主因FED在就業
市況改善之前,將會持續不斷購買資產。他說,以就業市場目前的狀態以及復甦的速度來
看,預期FED明(2013)年很可能會繼續買進資產,直到工作機會持續增加、失業率穩定
下滑為止。
Williams並指出,最新數據顯示,QE對刺激經濟成長仍有效益,且並未導致通膨上升。他
並強調,目前完全沒有看到通膨增溫的跡象,也並未誘使投資人承擔過多風險。
商品投資大師羅傑斯(Jim Rogers)11月7日在接受CNBC專訪時表示,隨著歐巴馬連任總
統,投資人應該要為通膨以及更多量化寬鬆貨幣政策(QE)預作準備。他並痛批,歐巴馬
與羅姆尼都很「邪惡」,兩個人都不值得他去投票。
羅傑斯說,歐巴馬勝選的話,通膨將會繼續增溫,央行也會印出更多鈔票,而債務、花費
也會愈來愈多,而他打算出售美國公債並買進黃金等貴金屬。
有「末日博士」之稱的投資大師麥嘉華(Marc Faber)11月7日在接受彭博社電是專訪時
表示,歐巴馬根本不在乎讓美國債台高築,而在柏南克(Ben S. Bernanke)刻意壓低利
率的推波助瀾下,債務將會永無止境地上升。
*編者按:本文僅供參考之用,並不構成要約、招攬或邀請、誘使、任何不論種類或形式
之申述或訂立任何建議及推薦,讀者務請運用個人獨立思考能力,自行作出投資決定,如
因相關建議招致損失,概與《精實財經媒體》、編者及作者無涉。
--
All Comments

By Hazel
at 2012-11-11T21:59
at 2012-11-11T21:59

By Mason
at 2012-11-12T08:49
at 2012-11-12T08:49

By Enid
at 2012-11-15T06:45
at 2012-11-15T06:45

By Rae
at 2012-11-19T21:03
at 2012-11-19T21:03

By Candice
at 2012-11-21T13:36
at 2012-11-21T13:36

By Suhail Hany
at 2012-11-22T20:55
at 2012-11-22T20:55

By Damian
at 2012-11-24T13:05
at 2012-11-24T13:05

By Hedy
at 2012-11-29T08:38
at 2012-11-29T08:38

By Megan
at 2012-12-03T12:06
at 2012-12-03T12:06

By Hamiltion
at 2012-12-06T21:22
at 2012-12-06T21:22

By Andy
at 2012-12-09T18:59
at 2012-12-09T18:59

By Damian
at 2012-12-13T14:04
at 2012-12-13T14:04

By Annie
at 2012-12-16T15:42
at 2012-12-16T15:42

By Cara
at 2012-12-16T18:50
at 2012-12-16T18:50

By Thomas
at 2012-12-19T01:38
at 2012-12-19T01:38

By Daph Bay
at 2012-12-22T11:14
at 2012-12-22T11:14

By Edward Lewis
at 2012-12-23T20:06
at 2012-12-23T20:06
要滑去哪都不知道....

By Caitlin
at 2012-12-24T21:56
at 2012-12-24T21:56

By Hedwig
at 2012-12-25T03:35
at 2012-12-25T03:35

By Kelly
at 2012-12-29T06:57
at 2012-12-29T06:57

By Robert
at 2013-01-01T12:06
at 2013-01-01T12:06

By Ida
at 2013-01-04T13:19
at 2013-01-04T13:19

By Emily
at 2013-01-04T16:09
at 2013-01-04T16:09

By Brianna
at 2013-01-05T00:12
at 2013-01-05T00:12

By Queena
at 2013-01-06T14:06
at 2013-01-06T14:06

By Ethan
at 2013-01-08T13:03
at 2013-01-08T13:03

By Bethany
at 2013-01-09T22:25
at 2013-01-09T22:25

By Delia
at 2013-01-13T03:35
at 2013-01-13T03:35

By Dorothy
at 2013-01-14T19:47
at 2013-01-14T19:47

By Puput
at 2013-01-19T11:22
at 2013-01-19T11:22

By Edward Lewis
at 2013-01-23T19:04
at 2013-01-23T19:04

By Sarah
at 2013-01-28T14:51
at 2013-01-28T14:51

By Noah
at 2013-01-29T20:02
at 2013-01-29T20:02

By Ingrid
at 2013-02-03T15:24
at 2013-02-03T15:24

By James
at 2013-02-06T17:36
at 2013-02-06T17:36

By Quanna
at 2013-02-07T17:43
at 2013-02-07T17:43

By Mason
at 2013-02-11T21:30
at 2013-02-11T21:30

By Tom
at 2013-02-16T08:44
at 2013-02-16T08:44

By Olga
at 2013-02-19T11:42
at 2013-02-19T11:42

By Lydia
at 2013-02-22T11:52
at 2013-02-22T11:52

By Jessica
at 2013-02-23T07:14
at 2013-02-23T07:14

By Ula
at 2013-02-23T11:26
at 2013-02-23T11:26

By Barb Cronin
at 2013-02-24T02:54
at 2013-02-24T02:54
電廠爆炸也是出事 XD

By Lily
at 2013-02-25T10:13
at 2013-02-25T10:13

By Xanthe
at 2013-03-02T07:36
at 2013-03-02T07:36

By Ivy
at 2013-03-04T08:15
at 2013-03-04T08:15
要到12年才一次出事,豈不是很好笑?

By Donna
at 2013-03-04T14:28
at 2013-03-04T14:28

By Isla
at 2013-03-07T09:43
at 2013-03-07T09:43

By Rachel
at 2013-03-09T23:20
at 2013-03-09T23:20

By Caroline
at 2013-03-13T13:29
at 2013-03-13T13:29

By Rachel
at 2013-03-18T02:05
at 2013-03-18T02:05

By Daph Bay
at 2013-03-22T08:15
at 2013-03-22T08:15

By Regina
at 2013-03-26T09:28
at 2013-03-26T09:28

By Cara
at 2013-03-30T04:34
at 2013-03-30T04:34

By Edward Lewis
at 2013-04-01T17:01
at 2013-04-01T17:01
人沒告訴你要心懷慈悲嗎?

By Kama
at 2013-04-04T02:37
at 2013-04-04T02:37

By Anonymous
at 2013-04-07T18:19
at 2013-04-07T18:19

By Harry
at 2013-04-10T13:30
at 2013-04-10T13:30

By Erin
at 2013-04-11T13:18
at 2013-04-11T13:18

By Michael
at 2013-04-14T06:54
at 2013-04-14T06:54

By Michael
at 2013-04-15T11:24
at 2013-04-15T11:24

By Hedda
at 2013-04-18T20:19
at 2013-04-18T20:19

By Jacob
at 2013-04-19T22:30
at 2013-04-19T22:30
XD,我真吃飽了撐了 XD

By Erin
at 2013-04-22T01:39
at 2013-04-22T01:39

By Agnes
at 2013-04-23T20:21
at 2013-04-23T20:21

By Daph Bay
at 2013-04-27T05:32
at 2013-04-27T05:32

By Zenobia
at 2013-04-28T19:42
at 2013-04-28T19:42

By Odelette
at 2013-05-01T21:46
at 2013-05-01T21:46

By Lucy
at 2013-05-04T14:25
at 2013-05-04T14:25

By Daph Bay
at 2013-05-08T08:09
at 2013-05-08T08:09

By Elizabeth
at 2013-05-11T03:58
at 2013-05-11T03:58

By Delia
at 2013-05-12T03:49
at 2013-05-12T03:49
亂講因果業報的果報你大概不知道,所以才會亂講一氣

By Poppy
at 2013-05-12T20:54
at 2013-05-12T20:54

By Olive
at 2013-05-15T04:17
at 2013-05-15T04:17

By Gary
at 2013-05-19T18:31
at 2013-05-19T18:31

By Jake
at 2013-05-22T14:41
at 2013-05-22T14:41

By James
at 2013-05-23T08:29
at 2013-05-23T08:29
其它就隨你胡扯亂講,至少業報比較輕

By Ina
at 2013-05-24T06:02
at 2013-05-24T06:02

By Jacob
at 2013-05-27T07:54
at 2013-05-27T07:54
天下事何處不是因果??呵~~

By Candice
at 2013-05-27T10:29
at 2013-05-27T10:29

By Xanthe
at 2013-05-31T16:34
at 2013-05-31T16:34

By Oliver
at 2013-05-31T19:51
at 2013-05-31T19:51
果,果報很重,比你亂扯的老美因果報應還重.
你不相信我比你多認識一點點因果,可以去Buddhism板搜我ID

By Dinah
at 2013-06-04T03:02
at 2013-06-04T03:02

By Margaret
at 2013-06-08T00:42
at 2013-06-08T00:42

By Lucy
at 2013-06-08T14:44
at 2013-06-08T14:44

By Caroline
at 2013-06-08T20:16
at 2013-06-08T20:16
造作與受報的主體. 簡單一句講完為什麼我說你在胡扯

By Callum
at 2013-06-09T17:52
at 2013-06-09T17:52
好事一件.有過有功,各不相抵

By Carolina Franco
at 2013-06-10T16:13
at 2013-06-10T16:13

By Caroline
at 2013-06-14T06:00
at 2013-06-14T06:00
如果你連這點都無法自行回答,大家也可知道你真的在胡扯.

By Kristin
at 2013-06-14T11:01
at 2013-06-14T11:01

By Jacob
at 2013-06-18T01:31
at 2013-06-18T01:31

By Elvira
at 2013-06-21T06:08
at 2013-06-21T06:08

By Lucy
at 2013-06-22T04:27
at 2013-06-22T04:27

By Sierra Rose
at 2013-06-24T01:39
at 2013-06-24T01:39
胡扯理論該怎麼解釋這點?
如果套用你的理論,共產黨執政也是當初中國人民自已選擇的,

By Daniel
at 2013-06-24T12:07
at 2013-06-24T12:07

By Frederica
at 2013-06-24T21:04
at 2013-06-24T21:04
你的理論完全無法自圓其說,剛好自證胡扯

By Elma
at 2013-06-27T05:35
at 2013-06-27T05:35

By Daph Bay
at 2013-06-28T05:38
at 2013-06-28T05:38

By Liam
at 2013-07-02T13:56
at 2013-07-02T13:56

By Annie
at 2013-07-03T01:45
at 2013-07-03T01:45

By Rebecca
at 2013-07-03T17:30
at 2013-07-03T17:30
字回你,這裏就變佛教板了.但你已經自已證明你不懂因果了,
所以真的就不要再亂用這兩個字.

By Damian
at 2013-07-08T16:21
at 2013-07-08T16:21

By Edith
at 2013-07-13T08:23
at 2013-07-13T08:23

By Ida
at 2013-07-17T15:56
at 2013-07-17T15:56

By David
at 2013-07-17T19:48
at 2013-07-17T19:48

By Tom
at 2013-07-21T22:46
at 2013-07-21T22:46

By Skylar DavisLinda
at 2013-07-25T08:12
at 2013-07-25T08:12

By Eden
at 2013-07-27T07:30
at 2013-07-27T07:30

By Franklin
at 2013-07-28T08:13
at 2013-07-28T08:13

By Damian
at 2013-08-01T12:16
at 2013-08-01T12:16

By Mia
at 2013-08-05T08:11
at 2013-08-05T08:11

By David
at 2013-08-08T11:31
at 2013-08-08T11:31

By Heather
at 2013-08-09T13:57
at 2013-08-09T13:57
得懂不意外啊! XD

By Blanche
at 2013-08-12T22:32
at 2013-08-12T22:32
重力吸引墜地,強烈碰撞地面,導致死亡重傷是因果,當然也可

By Hamiltion
at 2013-08-15T03:45
at 2013-08-15T03:45
胡扯半天的美國惡有惡報的業果式的因果,完全扯不上邊

By Ophelia
at 2013-08-19T21:36
at 2013-08-19T21:36

By William
at 2013-08-22T04:18
at 2013-08-22T04:18

By Hardy
at 2013-08-24T09:26
at 2013-08-24T09:26

By Ina
at 2013-08-29T04:39
at 2013-08-29T04:39

By Hamiltion
at 2013-09-01T18:41
at 2013-09-01T18:41

By Agatha
at 2013-09-02T07:06
at 2013-09-02T07:06
問題是你連先後都不知啊! XD 連該去先讀好FAQ,再來謹慎發

By Quintina
at 2013-09-06T23:21
at 2013-09-06T23:21

By Jacky
at 2013-09-08T00:51
at 2013-09-08T00:51

By Candice
at 2013-09-12T21:38
at 2013-09-12T21:38
正確來講,你應該講兩個都不懂.

By Belly
at 2013-09-17T14:03
at 2013-09-17T14:03

By Edwina
at 2013-09-18T03:21
at 2013-09-18T03:21

By Hardy
at 2013-09-18T16:28
at 2013-09-18T16:28

By Dorothy
at 2013-09-19T23:18
at 2013-09-19T23:18

By Margaret
at 2013-09-23T09:48
at 2013-09-23T09:48

By Iris
at 2013-09-27T18:27
at 2013-09-27T18:27

By Hazel
at 2013-09-30T20:14
at 2013-09-30T20:14

By William
at 2013-10-01T14:19
at 2013-10-01T14:19

By Sierra Rose
at 2013-10-06T06:52
at 2013-10-06T06:52

By Cara
at 2013-10-06T21:17
at 2013-10-06T21:17

By Irma
at 2013-10-09T14:35
at 2013-10-09T14:35

By Edward Lewis
at 2013-10-12T08:35
at 2013-10-12T08:35

By Jake
at 2013-10-15T17:32
at 2013-10-15T17:32

By Genevieve
at 2013-10-19T22:58
at 2013-10-19T22:58
且既深信因果 即是裁判 又何勞你我爭辯

By Zanna
at 2013-10-20T19:03
at 2013-10-20T19:03

By Anthony
at 2013-10-21T00:09
at 2013-10-21T00:09

By Tom
at 2013-10-21T14:12
at 2013-10-21T14:12
小廟容不了大和尚,能請999往別處發展嗎?

By Belly
at 2013-10-25T09:44
at 2013-10-25T09:44

By Poppy
at 2013-10-27T10:50
at 2013-10-27T10:50

By Anthony
at 2013-10-27T16:59
at 2013-10-27T16:59

By Andrew
at 2013-11-01T07:50
at 2013-11-01T07:50

By Rachel
at 2013-11-03T12:48
at 2013-11-03T12:48

By Olivia
at 2013-11-07T21:05
at 2013-11-07T21:05

By Elvira
at 2013-11-08T10:37
at 2013-11-08T10:37

By Elizabeth
at 2013-11-10T05:44
at 2013-11-10T05:44

By Audriana
at 2013-11-11T21:47
at 2013-11-11T21:47
但他的推文多少都還是會牽扯到政治或經濟議題的邊緣

By Steve
at 2013-11-16T03:50
at 2013-11-16T03:50

By Puput
at 2013-11-20T09:00
at 2013-11-20T09:00
另一位版主討論,兩人同時判定違規就懲處

By Selena
at 2013-11-23T07:41
at 2013-11-23T07:41

By Isla
at 2013-11-24T03:01
at 2013-11-24T03:01

By Frederic
at 2013-11-28T10:32
at 2013-11-28T10:32

By Rosalind
at 2013-11-28T15:09
at 2013-11-28T15:09

By Charlie
at 2013-12-01T08:34
at 2013-12-01T08:34

By Sandy
at 2013-12-04T16:54
at 2013-12-04T16:54

By Vanessa
at 2013-12-06T01:54
at 2013-12-06T01:54
膨或惡性通膨,因一直QE所致),這種推文不能視為引戰,那還有
什麼算引戰?

By Lydia
at 2013-12-06T22:29
at 2013-12-06T22:29
人是支持板主一併連我一起桶,我被桶一次沒關係,超人就要永
久停權了

By Joe
at 2013-12-09T09:39
at 2013-12-09T09:39

By Kyle
at 2013-12-13T22:57
at 2013-12-13T22:57
999這ID絕對不可能活到現在

By Vanessa
at 2013-12-15T18:35
at 2013-12-15T18:35

By Ophelia
at 2013-12-18T01:23
at 2013-12-18T01:23
的制序.你直接判了,超人不服,他可以依站規去申訴,pttlaw裏

By Hazel
at 2013-12-18T10:49
at 2013-12-18T10:49
思是某個板主看到又認定違規,就應該處理了.

By Damian
at 2013-12-22T03:37
at 2013-12-22T03:37

By Barb Cronin
at 2013-12-25T23:04
at 2013-12-25T23:04

By Valerie
at 2013-12-27T16:59
at 2013-12-27T16:59
光看一堆合乎八卦板標準的文或推文,去CCR板被桶得一踏糊塗
就可得知

By Jacob
at 2013-12-27T20:30
at 2013-12-27T20:30
某人水桶,竊以為還是有失大方。有道是「我不認同你的說法

By Skylar Davis
at 2013-12-30T06:47
at 2013-12-30T06:47
,不見得是上上策

By Dora
at 2014-01-03T18:46
at 2014-01-03T18:46
文詳細解釋其理論根據.而不是一再在各個文章的推文像機器

By Ophelia
at 2014-01-04T18:51
at 2014-01-04T18:51

By Susan
at 2014-01-06T16:43
at 2014-01-06T16:43
外超人一句就把不同意他觀點或有投資美金的人都打成了親美
派,這個已經不是言論自由了

By Olivia
at 2014-01-10T06:47
at 2014-01-10T06:47

By Frederic
at 2014-01-11T19:30
at 2014-01-11T19:30

By Jack
at 2014-01-16T06:36
at 2014-01-16T06:36
經驗給大家參考一下。小弟曾經管過某個遊戲的論壇網站,該網

By Rachel
at 2014-01-17T14:24
at 2014-01-17T14:24

By Jake
at 2014-01-21T16:59
at 2014-01-21T16:59

By Dora
at 2014-01-23T00:02
at 2014-01-23T00:02

By Ivy
at 2014-01-23T11:03
at 2014-01-23T11:03
有偏頗,還是因人設事,其實版友們都有眼睛都看得到。當時也

By Ivy
at 2014-01-24T20:05
at 2014-01-24T20:05

By Hamiltion
at 2014-01-29T05:47
at 2014-01-29T05:47

By John
at 2014-01-30T10:14
at 2014-01-30T10:14
沒什麼不可以。這種做法最後是個 Happy Ending,只不過每個人

By Tom
at 2014-02-01T19:59
at 2014-02-01T19:59

By Jack
at 2014-02-06T01:53
at 2014-02-06T01:53

By Dora
at 2014-02-06T11:05
at 2014-02-06T11:05
有的我當笑話來看,但是因為是閒聊文,尚可接受。只是在其他

By Damian
at 2014-02-10T06:10
at 2014-02-10T06:10

By Tom
at 2014-02-13T16:51
at 2014-02-13T16:51
知道什麼是對什麼是錯,版友沒有這種權力,版主有,這就是為

By Emma
at 2014-02-15T21:38
at 2014-02-15T21:38

By Hamiltion
at 2014-02-19T08:20
at 2014-02-19T08:20

By Queena
at 2014-02-22T17:21
at 2014-02-22T17:21

By Lucy
at 2014-02-24T09:08
at 2014-02-24T09:08
人觀點和作法,可能不適用所有人,僅提出讓各位版友參考。
Related Posts
美選後看金價 挑戰1,750美元

By Lucy
at 2012-11-09T10:53
at 2012-11-09T10:53
11/09 盤勢閒聊

By Blanche
at 2012-11-09T08:15
at 2012-11-09T08:15
熱錢來了 引爆台幣升值壓力

By Rosalind
at 2012-11-09T06:07
at 2012-11-09T06:07
MACD的背離

By Necoo
at 2012-11-08T22:56
at 2012-11-08T22:56
理財觀念書籍

By Odelette
at 2012-11-08T19:29
at 2012-11-08T19:29