CFA L1 econ question - 經濟

Table of Contents

※ [本文轉錄自 CFAiafeFSA 看板]

作者: kgc ( ) 看板: CFAiafeFSA
標題: [問題] CFA L1 econ question
時間: Tue Mar 9 08:59:24 2010


from Schweser 2010 Qbank 97006

statement: If we comapre any two productive inputs, the one with the higher

MRP(marginal revenue product) will earn greater economic rent.


why this statement is false? can't we imply higher MRP will result in steeper

supply curve(more inelastic supply)?

Or in labor market MRP is the demand curve while in economic rent we only

consider the difference bwtween the wage determined and the opportunity cost?


thanks for viewing.

--

All Comments

Elizabeth avatarElizabeth2010-03-14
如果造成較高MRP的原因,來自變動要素而非固定要素呢?
Elizabeth avatarElizabeth2010-03-14
就我模糊的印象,變動要素帶來的收益並不算是經濟租
Heather avatarHeather2010-03-16
提供一個可能的思考方向,未必正確僅供參考
Ida avatarIda2010-03-21
請加入您的想法, 否則將於 3/15 刪文, 謝謝配合.
Erin avatarErin2010-03-24
文章後半其實就是我的意見 能否請板主再看一次 謝謝
Rachel avatarRachel2010-03-27
修正 並不是固定要素的利潤才算是經濟租,只要在某段期間
Margaret avatarMargaret2010-04-01
"所有不會變動的要素之利潤"都算經濟租,因此就算是長期中
Puput avatarPuput2010-04-02
沒有固定要素的存在,仍然會有經濟租